» Articles » PMID: 20587551

Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Response Assessment Before High-dose Chemotherapy for Lymphoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Jul 1
PMID 20587551
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better define the prognostic ability of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) following salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Methods: We searched PubMed (from inception to January 31, 2010), bibliographies, and review articles without language restriction. Two assessors independently assessed study characteristics, quality, and results. We performed a meta-analysis to determine prognostic accuracy.

Results: Twelve studies including 630 patients were eligible. The most commonly evaluated histologies were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 313) and HL (n = 187), which were typically treated with various salvage and high-dose chemotherapy regimens. Studies typically employed nonstandardized protocols and diagnostic criteria. The prognostic accuracy was heterogeneous across the included studies. (18)F-FDG PET had a summary sensitivity of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.81) and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.87). The summary estimates were stable in sensitivity analyses. In four studies that performed direct comparisons between PET and conventional restaging modalities, PET had a superior accuracy for predicting treatment outcomes. Subgroup and metaregression analyses did not identify any particular factor to explain the observed heterogeneity.

Conclusion: (18)F-FDG PET performed after salvage therapy appears to be an appropriate test to predict treatment failure in patients with refractory or relapsed lymphoma who receive high-dose chemotherapy. Some evidence suggests PET is superior to conventional restaging for this purpose. Given the methodological limitations in the primary studies, prospective studies with standardized methodologies are needed to confirm and refine these promising results.

Citing Articles

Long-term effectiveness and safety of high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in daily practice in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Haeno T, Rai S, Miyake Y, Inoue M, Fujimoto K, Fujii A J Clin Exp Hematop. 2023; 63(2):99-107.

PMID: 37121716 PMC: 10410619. DOI: 10.3960/jslrt.23001.


Positron emission tomography derived metrics in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma with residual disease before autologous stem cell transplant.

Cherng H, Xu G, Feng L, Steiner R, Fayad L, Strati P Br J Haematol. 2022; 200(1):35-44.

PMID: 36068929 PMC: 9771924. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18441.


Prognostic value of F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography at diagnosis in untreated multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li Q, Hu L, Charwudzi A, Zhu W, Meng Y, Zhai Z Clin Exp Med. 2022; 23(1):31-43.

PMID: 35000022 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-021-00775-z.


Immunotherapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Current Landscape and Future Directions.

Modi D, Potugari B, Uberti J Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(22).

PMID: 34830980 PMC: 8616088. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225827.


A prospective study on early PET/CT scans during the first cycle of salvage chemotherapy for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Cherng H, Chuang H, Steiner R, Fayad L, Strati P, Nair R Leuk Lymphoma. 2021; 63(1):74-83.

PMID: 34435552 PMC: 9284943. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1971223.


References
1.
Filmont J, Gisselbrecht C, Cuenca X, Deville L, Ertault M, Brice P . The impact of pre- and post-transplantation positron emission tomography using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose on poor-prognosis lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Cancer. 2007; 110(6):1361-9. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22911. View

2.
McShane L, Altman D, Sauerbrei W, Taube S, Gion M, Clark G . Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97(16):1180-4. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji237. View

3.
Schot B, Zijlstra J, Sluiter W, van Imhoff G, Pruim J, Vaalburg W . Early FDG-PET assessment in combination with clinical risk scores determines prognosis in recurring lymphoma. Blood. 2006; 109(2):486-91. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-006957. View

4.
Cheson B, Horning S, Coiffier B, Shipp M, Fisher R, Connors J . Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17(4):1244. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1244. View

5.
Josting A, Franklin J, May M, Koch P, Beykirch M, Heinz J . New prognostic score based on treatment outcome of patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma registered in the database of the German Hodgkin's lymphoma study group. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(1):221-30. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.1.221. View