» Articles » PMID: 20585959

Fifteen Years Experience in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Pediatric Patients. Results and Considerations on a Debated Procedure

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Jun 30
PMID 20585959
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is rarely reported in pediatric patients. We report our 15-year experience on this topic to show the long-term results of this technique.

Methods: During a 15-year period, we operated 596 boys for unilateral inguinal hernia using laparoscopy. The age range was variable from 6 months to 15 years (median, 54 months), with a median body weight of 18.5 (range, 8-54) kg. Preoperatively, 352 boys had a right hernia and 172 had a left hernia. We always used three trocars. We used the laparoscopic herniorrhaphy described by our group 15 years ago; it consists of sectioning the sac distally to the inguinal ring and performing a pursestring suture around the periorificial peritoneum using a 4/0 nonresorbable suture.

Results: The median operating time was 19 min. All procedures were performed in a day-hospital setting. As for laparoscopic findings in 95 of 596 patients (15.9%), we found a contralateral patency of the processus vaginalis. In these 95 cases, we performed bilateral herniorrhaphy. In 7 of 596 patients (1.2%), we discovered a direct hernia. With follow-up between 1 and 15 years, we have only 11 recurrences (1.5%)-all reoperated by laparoscopy.

Conclusions: We believe that laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia performed by expert hands is a safe and effective procedure to perform with long-term follow-up. Its ability to repair simultaneously all forms of inguinal hernias together with contralateral patencies has cemented its role as a viable alternative to conventional repair.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) versus Open Ligation of the Patent Processus Vaginalis for the Treatment of Communicating Pediatric Hydrocele.

Pogorelic Z, Stanic P, Baskovic M Children (Basel). 2024; 11(4).

PMID: 38671654 PMC: 11049082. DOI: 10.3390/children11040437.


Paediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: Level of disconnection of peritoneal cuff - An observational study.

Ali M, Rashi R, Sinha A, Kumar A, Kumar B Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2023; 20(3):202-205.

PMID: 37470556 PMC: 10450117. DOI: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_98_21.


Laparoscopic hernia repair in children: does recreating the open operation improve outcomes? A systematic review.

Goneidy A, Verhoef C, Lansdale N, Peters R, Wilkinson D Hernia. 2023; 27(5):1037-1046.

PMID: 36949270 PMC: 10533621. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02772-5.


Laparoscopic percutaneous closure of patent processus vaginalis without hydrocelectomy for childhood primary hydrocele.

Son T, Bao H, Van N Pediatr Surg Int. 2023; 39(1):103.

PMID: 36740654 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-023-05393-2.


Laparoscopic management of infantile hydrocele in pediatric age group.

Elhaddad A, Awad M, Shehata S, Shehata M Pediatr Surg Int. 2022; 38(4):581-587.

PMID: 35124724 PMC: 8913565. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05064-8.


References
1.
Becmeur F, Philippe P, Lemandat-Schultz A, Moog R, Grandadam S, Lieber A . A continuous series of 96 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in children by a new technique. Surg Endosc. 2005; 18(12):1738-41. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9008-5. View

2.
Esposito C, Montinaro L, Alicchio F, Scermino S, Basile A, Armenise T . Technical standardization of laparoscopic herniorraphy in pediatric patients. World J Surg. 2009; 33(9):1846-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0121-4. View

3.
Lee S, Dubois J . Laparoscopic diagnosis and repair of pediatric femoral hernia. Initial experience of four cases. Surg Endosc. 2001; 14(12):1110-3. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000237. View

4.
Rescorla F, West K, Engum S, Scherer 3rd L, Grosfeld J . The "other side" of pediatric hernias: the role of laparoscopy. Am Surg. 1997; 63(8):690-3. View

5.
Spurbeck W, Prasad R, Lobe T . Two-year experience with minimally invasive herniorrhaphy in children. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19(4):551-3. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8922-x. View