» Articles » PMID: 20585914

The Mark Coventry Award: Diagnosis of Early Postoperative TKA Infection Using Synovial Fluid Analysis

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2010 Jun 30
PMID 20585914
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Synovial fluid white blood cell count is useful for diagnosing periprosthetic infections but the utility of this test in the early postoperative period remains unknown as hemarthrosis and postoperative inflammation may render standard cutoff values inaccurate.

Questions/purposes: We evaluated the diagnostic performance of four common laboratory tests, the synovial white blood cell count, differential, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate to detect infection in the first 6 weeks after primary TKA.

Methods: We reviewed 11,964 primary TKAs and identified 146 that had a knee aspiration within 6 weeks of surgery. Infection was diagnosed in 19 of the 146 knees by positive cultures or gross purulence. We compared demographic information, time from surgery, and the laboratory test values between infected and noninfected knees to determine if any could identify infection early postoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine optimal cutoff values for each of the test parameters.

Results: Synovial white blood cell count (92,600 versus 4200 cells/μL), percentage of polymorphonuclear cells (89.6% versus 76.9%), and C-reactive protein (171 versus 88 mg/L) were higher in the infected group. The optimal synovial white blood cell cutoff was 27,800 cells/μL (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 99%; positive predictive value, 94%; negative predictive value, 98%) for diagnosing infection. The optimal cutoff for the differential was 89% polymorphonuclear cells and for C-reactive protein 95 mg/L.

Conclusions: With a cutoff of 27,800 cells/μL, synovial white blood cell count predicted infection within 6 weeks after primary TKA with a positive predicted value of 94% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The use of standard cutoff values for this parameter (~ 3000 cells/μL) would have led to unnecessary reoperations.

Level Of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Citing Articles

Preoperative Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection in Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Revision Arthroplasties: Development and Validation of Machine Learning Algorithm.

Di Matteo V, Morandini P, Savevski V, Grappiolo G, Loppini M Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075787 PMC: 11898876. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050539.


Tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase is an alternative synovial biomarker for diagnosis of septic arthritis in knee joint.

Lee B, Na Y, Ham S, Jin M, Kim Y, Kim K Knee Surg Relat Res. 2024; 36(1):27.

PMID: 39285443 PMC: 11403948. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-024-00229-2.


An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Al-Jabri T, Ridha M, Wood M, Kayani B, Jayadev C, McCulloch R Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024; 16:120308.

PMID: 38957745 PMC: 11218870. DOI: 10.52965/001c.120308.


Diagnostic cutoff values of synovial fluid biomarkers for acute postoperative prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sabater-Martos M, Ferrer M, Morata L, Soriano A, Martinez-Pastor J J Bone Jt Infect. 2024; 9(1):17-26.

PMID: 38601003 PMC: 11002915. DOI: 10.5194/jbji-9-17-2024.


The False-Positive Rate of Synovial Fluid Culture at a Single Clinical Laboratory Using Culture Bottles.

Deirmengian C, Toler K, Sharma V, Miamidian J, McLaren A Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e55641.

PMID: 38586694 PMC: 10996834. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55641.


References
1.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Schmier J, Mowat F, Saleh K, Dybvik E . Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89 Suppl 3:144-51. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00587. View

2.
Phillips J, Crane T, Noy M, Elliott T, Grimer R . The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: a 15-year prospective survey. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88(7):943-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17150. View

3.
Kurtz S, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong K, Zhao K, Parvizi J . Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(7):984-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.017. View

4.
Bilgen O, Atici T, Durak K, Karaeminogullari , Bilgen M . C-reactive protein values and erythrocyte sedimentation rates after total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Int Med Res. 2001; 29(1):7-12. DOI: 10.1177/147323000102900102. View

5.
Hanssen A, Rand J . Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1999; 48:111-22. View