Electrical Stimulation Compared with Tolterodine for Treatment of Urge/urge Incontinence Amongst Women--a Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Urology
Affiliations
Introduction And Hypothesis: Few randomized controlled trials have compared electrical stimulation treatment with drug therapy. Our hypothesis was that electrical stimulation treatment in women with urgency/urge incontinence would be more efficient compared to drug treatment.
Methods: Women ≥18 years of age with urgency/urge incontinence were randomized to receive either ten electrical stimulation treatments vaginally and transanally over a period of 5-7 weeks or tolterodine 4 mg orally once daily.
Results: Sixty-one women completed the study. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in micturition rate from baseline to 6 months, mean difference, -0.40 (95% confidence interval (CI), -1.61 to 0.82), but a clearly significant difference within each group for electrical stimulation, -2.8 (95% CI, -3.7 to -1.9), and for tolterodine, -3.2 (95% CI, -4.1 to -2.4).
Conclusions: Both treatments reduced the number of micturitions, but electrical stimulation was not found to be superior to tolterodine.
Kurt T, Yilmaz B, Toprak Celenay S World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):423.
PMID: 39033475 PMC: 11271381. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05126-7.
Technologies for Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Functionality: A Systematic Review.
Forstl N, Adler I, Suss F, Dendorfer S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(12).
PMID: 38931784 PMC: 11207910. DOI: 10.3390/s24124001.
Stoniute A, Madhuvrata P, Still M, Barron-Millar E, Nabi G, Omar M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 5:CD003781.
PMID: 37160401 PMC: 10167789. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.
Todhunter-Brown A, Hazelton C, Campbell P, Elders A, Hagen S, McClurg D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 9:CD012337.
PMID: 36053030 PMC: 9437962. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012337.pub2.
Mazur-Bialy A, Kolomanska-Bogucka D, Nowakowski C, Tim S J Clin Med. 2020; 9(4).
PMID: 32340194 PMC: 7230757. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041211.