» Articles » PMID: 20585755

Electrical Stimulation Compared with Tolterodine for Treatment of Urge/urge Incontinence Amongst Women--a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Jun 30
PMID 20585755
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: Few randomized controlled trials have compared electrical stimulation treatment with drug therapy. Our hypothesis was that electrical stimulation treatment in women with urgency/urge incontinence would be more efficient compared to drug treatment.

Methods: Women ≥18 years of age with urgency/urge incontinence were randomized to receive either ten electrical stimulation treatments vaginally and transanally over a period of 5-7 weeks or tolterodine 4 mg orally once daily.

Results: Sixty-one women completed the study. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in micturition rate from baseline to 6 months, mean difference, -0.40 (95% confidence interval (CI), -1.61 to 0.82), but a clearly significant difference within each group for electrical stimulation, -2.8 (95% CI, -3.7 to -1.9), and for tolterodine, -3.2 (95% CI, -4.1 to -2.4).

Conclusions: Both treatments reduced the number of micturitions, but electrical stimulation was not found to be superior to tolterodine.

Citing Articles

Effects of external neuromuscular electrical stimulation in women with urgency urinary incontinence: a randomized sham-controlled study.

Kurt T, Yilmaz B, Toprak Celenay S World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):423.

PMID: 39033475 PMC: 11271381. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05126-7.


Technologies for Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Functionality: A Systematic Review.

Forstl N, Adler I, Suss F, Dendorfer S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(12).

PMID: 38931784 PMC: 11207910. DOI: 10.3390/s24124001.


Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults.

Stoniute A, Madhuvrata P, Still M, Barron-Millar E, Nabi G, Omar M Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 5:CD003781.

PMID: 37160401 PMC: 10167789. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.


Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Todhunter-Brown A, Hazelton C, Campbell P, Elders A, Hagen S, McClurg D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 9:CD012337.

PMID: 36053030 PMC: 9437962. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012337.pub2.


Urinary Incontinence in Women: Modern Methods of Physiotherapy as a Support for Surgical Treatment or Independent Therapy.

Mazur-Bialy A, Kolomanska-Bogucka D, Nowakowski C, Tim S J Clin Med. 2020; 9(4).

PMID: 32340194 PMC: 7230757. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041211.


References
1.
Chapple C, Khullar V, Gabriel Z, Muston D, Bitoun C, Weinstein D . The effects of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: an update of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2008; 54(3):543-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.047. View

2.
Smith 3rd J . Intravaginal stimulation randomized trial. J Urol. 1996; 155(1):127-30. View

3.
Caputo R, Benson J, McClellan E . Intravaginal maximal electrical stimulation in the treatment of urinary incontinence. J Reprod Med. 1993; 38(9):667-71. View

4.
Nakamura M, Sakurai T, Sugao H, Sonoda T . Maximum electrical stimulation for urge incontinence. Urol Int. 1987; 42(4):285-7. DOI: 10.1159/000281957. View

5.
Brubaker L, Benson J, Bent A, Clark A, Shott S . Transvaginal electrical stimulation for female urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177(3):536-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70142-x. View