» Articles » PMID: 20582489

Anatomical Global Spatial Normalization

Overview
Date 2010 Jun 29
PMID 20582489
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anatomical global spatial normalization (aGSN) is presented as a method to scale high-resolution brain images to control for variability in brain size without altering the mean size of other brain structures. Two types of mean preserving scaling methods were investigated, "shape preserving" and "shape standardizing". aGSN was tested by examining 56 brain structures from an adult brain atlas of 40 individuals (LPBA40) before and after normalization, with detailed analyses of cerebral hemispheres, all gyri collectively, cerebellum, brainstem, and left and right caudate, putamen, and hippocampus. Mean sizes of brain structures as measured by volume, distance, and area were preserved and variance reduced for both types of scale factors. An interesting finding was that scale factors derived from each of the ten brain structures were also mean preserving. However, variance was best reduced using whole brain hemispheres as the reference structure, and this reduction was related to its high average correlation with other brain structures. The fractional reduction in variance of structure volumes was directly related to ρ (2), the square of the reference-to-structure correlation coefficient. The average reduction in variance in volumes by aGSN with whole brain hemispheres as the reference structure was approximately 32%. An analytical method was provided to directly convert between conventional and aGSN scale factors to support adaptation of aGSN to popular spatial normalization software packages.

Citing Articles

Visualizing Volumetric and Segmentation Data using Mol* Volumes & Segmentations 2.0.

Chareshneu A, Cantara A, Tichy D, Sehnal D Curr Protoc. 2024; 4(12):e70070.

PMID: 39651964 PMC: 11627126. DOI: 10.1002/cpz1.70070.


A comparative meta-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies and gene expression profiles revealing the similarities and differences between late life depression and mild cognitive impairment.

Zhao L, Niu L, Dai H, Lee T, Huang R, Zhang R Psychol Med. 2024; :1-10.

PMID: 39582389 PMC: 11650184. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002563.


The Complex Role Played by the Default Mode Network during Sexual Stimulation: A Cluster-Based fMRI Meta-Analysis.

Pinto J, Comprido C, Moreira V, Maccarone M, Cogoni C, Faustino R Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39062393 PMC: 11273531. DOI: 10.3390/bs14070570.


Activation Likelihood Estimation Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis: a Powerful Tool for Emotion Research.

Costa T, Ferraro M, Manuello J, Camasio A, Nani A, Mancuso L Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024; 17:2331-2345.

PMID: 38882233 PMC: 11179639. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S453035.


Contributions of the left and right thalami to language: A meta-analytic approach.

Bulut T, Hagoort P Brain Struct Funct. 2024; 229(9):2149-2166.

PMID: 38625556 PMC: 11611992. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-024-02795-3.


References
1.
Toga A, Banerjee P . Registration revisited. J Neurosci Methods. 1993; 48(1-2):1-13. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(05)80002-0. View

2.
Hofman M . Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. II. The cortical volume. Brain Behav Evol. 1988; 32(1):17-26. DOI: 10.1159/000116529. View

3.
Sowell E, Peterson B, Kan E, Woods R, Yoshii J, Bansal R . Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age. Cereb Cortex. 2006; 17(7):1550-60. PMC: 2329809. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl066. View

4.
Schormann T, Zilles K . Limitations of the principal-axes theory. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 16(6):942-7. DOI: 10.1109/42.650891. View

5.
Jenkinson M, Smith S . A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001; 5(2):143-56. DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6. View