» Articles » PMID: 20573994

Positive and Negative Cis-regulatory Elements Directing Postfertilization Maternal MRNA Translational Control in Mouse Embryos

Overview
Specialties Cell Biology
Physiology
Date 2010 Jun 25
PMID 20573994
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mechanisms providing for temporally complex patterns of maternal mRNA translation after fertilization are poorly understood. We employed bioinformatics analysis to compare populations of mRNAs enriched specifically on polysomes at the metaphase II (MII) stage oocyte and late one-cell stages and a detailed deletion/truncation series to identify elements that regulate translation. We used the Bag4 3' untranslated region (UTR) as a model. Bioinformatics analysis revealed one conserved motif, subsequently confirmed by functional studies to be a key translation repressor element. The deletion/truncation studies revealed additional regulatory motifs, most notably a strong translation activator element of <30 nt. Analysis of mRNA secondary structure suggests that secondary structure plays a key role in translation repression. Additional bioinformatics analysis of the regulated mRNA population revealed a diverse collection of regulatory motifs found in small numbers of mRNAs, highlighting a high degree of sequence diversity and combinatorial complexity in the overall control of the maternal mRNA population. We conclude that translational control after fertilization is driven primarily by negative regulatory mechanisms opposing strong translational activators, with stage-specific release of the inhibitory influences to permit recruitment. The combination of bioinformatics analysis and deletion/truncation studies provides the necessary approach for dissecting postfertilization translation regulatory mechanisms.

Citing Articles

Predictive modeling of oocyte maternal mRNA features for five mammalian species reveals potential shared and species-restricted regulators during maturation.

Schall P, Latham K Physiol Genomics. 2023; 56(1):9-31.

PMID: 37842744 PMC: 11281819. DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00048.2023.


Meeting the meiotic challenge: Specializations in mammalian oocyte spindle formation.

Severance A, Latham K Mol Reprod Dev. 2018; 85(3):178-187.

PMID: 29411912 PMC: 5864121. DOI: 10.1002/mrd.22967.


PLK1 regulates spindle association of phosphorylated eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein and spindle function in mouse oocytes.

Severance A, Latham K Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2017; 313(5):C501-C515.

PMID: 28794108 PMC: 5792166. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00075.2017.


Maternal RNA regulates Aurora C kinase during mouse oocyte maturation in a translation-independent fashion.

Balboula A, Blengini C, Gentilello A, Takahashi M, Schindler K Biol Reprod. 2017; 96(6):1197-1209.

PMID: 28575288 PMC: 6279119. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/iox047.


Analysis of translation using polysome profiling.

Chasse H, Boulben S, Costache V, Cormier P, Morales J Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(3):e15.

PMID: 28180329 PMC: 5388431. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw907.


References
1.
Ma S, Liu X, Miao D, Han Z, Zhang X, Miao Y . Parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes by strontium chloride: a search for the best conditions. Theriogenology. 2005; 64(5):1142-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.03.002. View

2.
Cosson B, Braun F, Paillard L, Blackshear P, Osborne H . Identification of a novel Xenopus laevis poly (A) binding protein. Biol Cell. 2004; 96(7):519-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.biolcel.2004.04.006. View

3.
Evsikov A, Graber J, Brockman J, Hampl A, Holbrook A, Singh P . Cracking the egg: molecular dynamics and evolutionary aspects of the transition from the fully grown oocyte to embryo. Genes Dev. 2006; 20(19):2713-27. PMC: 1578697. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1471006. View

4.
Pique M, Lopez J, Foissac S, Guigo R, Mendez R . A combinatorial code for CPE-mediated translational control. Cell. 2008; 132(3):434-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.038. View

5.
Oh B, Hwang S, McLaughlin J, Solter D, Knowles B . Timely translation during the mouse oocyte-to-embryo transition. Development. 2000; 127(17):3795-803. DOI: 10.1242/dev.127.17.3795. View