» Articles » PMID: 20559559

Modelling Visual Neglect: Computational Insights into Conscious Perception

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2010 Jun 19
PMID 20559559
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Visual neglect is an attentional deficit typically resulting from parietal cortex lesion and sometimes frontal lesion. Patients fail to attend to objects and events in the visual hemifield contralateral to their lesion during visual search.

Methodology/principal Finding: The aim of this work was to examine the effects of parietal and frontal lesion in an existing computational model of visual attention and search and simulate visual search behaviour under lesion conditions. We find that unilateral parietal lesion in this model leads to symptoms of visual neglect in simulated search scan paths, including an inhibition of return (IOR) deficit, while frontal lesion leads to milder neglect and to more severe deficits in IOR and perseveration in the scan path. During simulations of search under unilateral parietal lesion, the model's extrastriate ventral stream area exhibits lower activity for stimuli in the neglected hemifield compared to that for stimuli in the normally perceived hemifield. This could represent a computational correlate of differences observed in neuroimaging for unconscious versus conscious perception following parietal lesion.

Conclusions/significance: Our results lead to the prediction, supported by effective connectivity evidence, that connections between the dorsal and ventral visual streams may be an important factor in the explanation of perceptual deficits in parietal lesion patients and of conscious perception in general.

Citing Articles

Pseudoneglect in Visual Search: Behavioral Evidence and Connectional Constraints in Simulated Neural Circuitry.

Gigliotta O, Seidel Malkinson T, Miglino O, Bartolomeo P eNeuro. 2018; 4(6).

PMID: 29291241 PMC: 5745611. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0154-17.2017.


Lateral specialization in unilateral spatial neglect: a cognitive robotics model.

Conti D, Di Nuovo S, Cangelosi A, Di Nuovo A Cogn Process. 2016; 17(3):321-8.

PMID: 27018020 PMC: 4933727. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-016-0761-x.


Visual search and line bisection in hemianopia: computational modelling of cortical compensatory mechanisms and comparison with hemineglect.

Lanyon L, Barton J PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e54919.

PMID: 23390506 PMC: 3563648. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054919.


Motor Consciousness during Intention-Based and Stimulus-Based Actions: Modulating Attention Resources through Mindfulness Meditation.

Delevoye-Turrell Y, Bobineau C Front Psychol. 2012; 3:290.

PMID: 22973242 PMC: 3438819. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00290.


Spatio-temporal features of visual exploration in unilaterally brain-damaged subjects with or without neglect: results from a touchscreen test.

Rabuffetti M, Farina E, Alberoni M, Pellegatta D, Appollonio I, Affanni P PLoS One. 2012; 7(2):e31511.

PMID: 22347489 PMC: 3275551. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031511.

References
1.
Rees G, Wojciulik E, Clarke K, Husain M, Frith C, Driver J . Neural correlates of conscious and unconscious vision in parietal extinction. Neurocase. 2002; 8(5):387-93. DOI: 10.1076/neur.8.4.387.16190. View

2.
Binder J, Marshall R, Lazar R, Benjamin J, Mohr J . Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. Arch Neurol. 1992; 49(11):1187-94. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530350109026. View

3.
Posner M, Walker J, Friedrich F, Rafal R . Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J Neurosci. 1984; 4(7):1863-74. PMC: 6564871. View

4.
Behrmann M, Watt S, Black S, Barton J . Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia. 1997; 35(11):1445-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00058-4. View

5.
Chelazzi L, Miller E, Duncan J, DeSimone R . A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature. 1993; 363(6427):345-7. DOI: 10.1038/363345a0. View