Article: The masticator space. Value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in localisation and characterisation of lesions

Aim of the study was to assess the different roles of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the evaluation of anatomical origin and pathological nature of lesions involving the masticator space. Overall 41 cases (31 computed tomography and 14 magnetic resonance imaging) of lesions involving masticator space were retrospectively reviewed by two experienced radiologists in consensus. Reference standards were histopathological results and clinical-radiological follow-up after one year. Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were performed with and without intravenous injection of contrast. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were correct in identifying the space of origin of lesions respectively in 96% and 92% of cases. Computed tomography correctly diagnosed the nature of lesions in 81% of cases and magnetic resonance imaging in 93% of cases; computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging correctly characterized, respectively, 88% and 100% of malignant lesions and, respectively, 73% and 83% of benign lesions. In conclusion both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were effective in the identification of the origin of non-extensive lesions involving masticator space. Computed tomography was more precise in depicting lesions originating from masticator space, while magnetic resonance imaging was more correct in depicting lesions originating from contiguous spaces and involving secondarily the masticator space. Magnetic resonance imaging should always be preferred to characterise lesions, nevertheless computed tomography should be chosen in cases with suspected inflammatory involvement of mandible bone.

Citing Articles

Computed tomography evaluation of alterations in the masticator space due to invasion by malignant head and neck neoplasms.

Campinhos M, Curioni O, Soares A, Marcucci M Radiol Bras. 2024; 56(5):275-281.

PMID: 38204895 PMC: 10775806. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0024-en.

Compartmental surgery for T4b oral squamous cell carcinoma involving the masticatory space.

Mattavelli D, Montenegro C, Piazza C Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 32(2):55-61.

PMID: 38193497 PMC: 10919272. DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000958.

Outcomes of clinico-radiologically advanced cancer (cT4b) of buccal mucosa: a retrospective analysis of 104 patients.

Das S, Sharan R, Attakkil A, Sen S, Manikantan K, Jain P Ecancermedicalscience. 2022; 16:1400.

PMID: 35919244 PMC: 9300411. DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1400.

Prognostic factors for lymph node metastasis from upper gingival carcinomas.

Aldosimani M, Verdonschot R, Iwamoto Y, Nakazawa M, Mallya S, Kakimoto N Oral Radiol. 2021; 38(3):389-396.

PMID: 34559370 PMC: 9200680. DOI: 10.1007/s11282-021-00568-w.

A Rare Case of Idiopathic Temporal Muscle Abscess in a Nine-month-old Infant.

Oki S, Kawabori M, Motegi H, Yamaguchi S, Kobayashi H, Terasaka S Intern Med. 2019; 58(18):2699-2702.

PMID: 31178474 PMC: 6794185. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2727-19.

References

1.

Kimura Y, Sumi M, Sumi T, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Nakamura T . Deep extension from carcinoma arising from the gingiva: CT and MR imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23(3):468-72. PMC: 7975314. View

2.

Chong J, Hinckley L, Ginsberg L . Masticator space abnormalities associated with mandibular osteoradionecrosis: MR and CT findings in five patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21(1):175-8. PMC: 7976370. View

3.

Srinivasan A, Dvorak R, Perni K, Rohrer S, Mukherji S . Differentiation of benign and malignant pathology in the head and neck using 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values: early experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 29(1):40-4. PMC: 8119114. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0743. View

4.

Flynn T, Shanti R, Levi M, Adamo A, Kraut R, Trieger N . Severe odontogenic infections, part 1: prospective report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64(7):1093-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.015. View

5.

Shah G, Wesolowski J, Ansari S, Mukherji S . New directions in head and neck imaging. J Surg Oncol. 2008; 97(8):644-8. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21022. View

6.

Obayashi N, Ariji Y, Goto M, Izumi M, Naitoh M, Kurita K . Spread of odontogenic infection originating in the maxillary teeth: computerized tomographic assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 98(2):223-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.05.014. View

7.

Hariya Y, Yuasa K, Nakayama E, Kawazu T, Okamura K, Kanda S . Value of computed tomography findings in differentiating between intraosseous malignant tumors and osteomyelitis of the mandible affecting the masticator space. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 95(4):503-9. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2003.134. View

8.

Aziz M, Cowie R, SKINNER C, Mosaddad H . Complete pterygoidectomy--a novel method for the topographical investigation of the deep masticator space and its contents. Clin Anat. 2001; 14(5):354-62. DOI: 10.1002/ca.1063. View

9.

Connor S, Davitt S . Masticator space masses and pseudomasses. Clin Radiol. 2004; 59(3):237-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2003.08.008. View

10.

Jones K, Silver J, Millar W, Mandel L . Chronic submasseteric abscess: anatomic, radiologic, and pathologic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24(6):1159-63. PMC: 8149006. View

11.

De-Vicente-Rodriguez J . Maxillofacial cellulitis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2004; 9 Suppl:133-8. View

The Masticator Space. Value of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Localisation and Characterisation of Lesions