» Articles » PMID: 20552298

TP53 Arg72Pro Polymorphism and Endometrial Cancer Risk: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Med Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 Jun 17
PMID 20552298
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies investigating the relationship between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk reported conflicting results. To explore a more precise estimate of the effect of this polymorphism on endometrial carcinogenesis, a meta-analysis was performed by searching eligible studies in PubMed. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association for codominant model (Arg/Arg vs. Pro/Pro, Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro), dominant model (Arg/Arg+Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro), and recessive model (Arg/Arg vs. Arg/Pro+Pro/Pro), respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed by Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in controls, the specimen of cases for determining TP53 genotypes, sample size, the source of control and case groups, and ethnicity. We identified 8 case-control studies involving 2,154 subjects for this meta-analysis. Overall, no evidence of association was observed between TP53 genotypes and endometrial cancer risk in all genetic models (Arg/Arg vs. Pro/Pro: OR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.69-1.39, P=0.90; Arg/Pro vs. Pro/Pro: OR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.71-1.42, P=0.98; dominant model: OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.71-1.38, P=0.95; recessive model: OR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.80-1.41, P=0.95). Stratified analyses also detected no significant association in any subgroup, except among those studies with controls deviated from HWE in recessive model (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.07-2.39). In conclusion, we did not observe any evidence for a role of TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism in endometrial cancer. The reported significant association between this polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk may be due to methodological errors such as selection bias, small sample size, Type I error, and population stratification.

Citing Articles

The Expression Levels of XLF and Mutant P53 Are Inversely Correlated in Head and Neck Cancer Cells.

Feng S, Rabii R, Liang G, Song C, Chen W, Guo M J Cancer. 2016; 7(11):1374-82.

PMID: 27471552 PMC: 4964120. DOI: 10.7150/jca.14669.


Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA prevalence and p53 codon 72 (Arg72Pro) polymorphism in prostate cancer in a Greek group of patients.

Michopoulou V, Derdas S, Symvoulakis E, Mourmouras N, Nomikos A, Delakas D Tumour Biol. 2014; 35(12):12765-73.

PMID: 25213701 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2604-7.


Comparative study and meta-analysis of meta-analysis studies for the correlation of genomic markers with early cancer detection.

Lanara Z, Giannopoulou E, Fullen M, Kostantinopoulos E, Nebel J, Kalofonos H Hum Genomics. 2013; 7:14.

PMID: 23738773 PMC: 3686617. DOI: 10.1186/1479-7364-7-14.


Assessment of the XPC (A2920C), XPF (T30028C), TP53 (Arg72Pro) and GSTP1 (Ile105Val) polymorphisms in the risk of cutaneous melanoma.

Oliveira C, Rinck-Junior J, Lourenco G, Moraes A, Lima C J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013; 139(7):1199-206.

PMID: 23568549 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-013-1430-4.

References
1.
Thakkinstian A, McElduff P, DEste C, Duffy D, Attia J . A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies. Stat Med. 2004; 24(9):1291-306. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2010. View

2.
Peller S, Halperin R, Schneider D, Kopilova Y, Rotter V . Polymorphisms of the p53 gene in women with ovarian or endometrial carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 1998; 6(1):193-7. DOI: 10.3892/or.6.1.193. View

3.
Trikalinos T, Salanti G, Khoury M, Ioannidis J . Impact of violations and deviations in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium on postulated gene-disease associations. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(4):300-9. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj046. View

4.
Hosking L, Lumsden S, Lewis K, Yeo A, McCarthy L, Bansal A . Detection of genotyping errors by Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004; 12(5):395-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201164. View

5.
Zhang Z, Wang M, Wu D, Wang M, Tong N, Tian Y . P53 codon 72 polymorphism contributes to breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 39 case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 120(2):509-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0480-4. View