Population Pharmacokinetics of Lopinavir in Combination with Rifampicin-based Antitubercular Treatment in HIV-infected South African Children
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: The population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lopinavir in tuberculosis (TB)/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infected South African children taking super-boosted lopinavir (lopinavir/ritonavir ratio 1:1) as part of antiretroviral treatment in the presence of rifampicin were compared with the population PK of lopinavir in HIV-infected South African children taking standard doses of lopinavir/ritonavir (ratio 4:1).
Methods: Lopinavir concentrations were measured in 15 TB/HIV-co-infected paediatric patients who were sampled during and after rifampicin-based TB treatment and in 15 HIV-infected children without TB. During TB therapy, the dose of ritonavir was increased to lopinavir/ritonavir 1:1 in order to compensate for the induction of rifampicin. The children received median (interquartile range=IQR) doses of lopinavir 292 mg/m(2) (274, 309) and ritonavir 301 mg/m(2) (286, 309) twice daily. After TB treatment completion the children received standard doses of lopinavir/ritonavir 4:1 (median [IQR] lopinavir dose 289 mg/m(2) [286, 303] twice daily) as did those without TB (median [IQR] lopinavir dose 265 mg/m(2) [249, 289] twice daily).
Results: Lopinavir oral clearance (CL/F) was about 30% lower in children without TB than in co-infected children treated with super-boosted lopinavir. However, the predicted lopinavir C(min) was above the recommended minimum therapeutic concentration during TB/HIV co-treatment in the 15 children. Lopinavir CL/F increased linearly during the dosing interval.
Conclusions: Increasing the ritonavir dose to achieve a lopinavir/ritonavir ratio of 1:1 when given in combination with rifampicin-based TB treatment did not completely compensate for the enhancement of lopinavir CL/F caused by rifampicin. The time-dependent lopinavir CL/F might be due to a time-dependent recovery from ritonavir inhibition of lopinavir metabolism during the dosing interval.
A fully automatic tool for development of population pharmacokinetic models.
Chen X, Nordgren R, Belin S, Hamdan A, Wang S, Yang T CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2024; 13(10):1784-1797.
PMID: 39190006 PMC: 11494844. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13222.
Jacobs T, Svensson E, Musiime V, Rojo P, Dooley K, McIlleron H J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020; 75(12):3433-3457.
PMID: 32785712 PMC: 7662174. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa328.
Model-Based Residual Post-Processing for Residual Model Identification.
Ibrahim M, Nordgren R, Kjellsson M, Karlsson M AAPS J. 2018; 20(5):81.
PMID: 29968184 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-018-0240-7.
Archary M, Mcllleron H, Bobat R, La Russa P, Sibaya T, Wiesner L Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017; 37(4):349-355.
PMID: 29227461 PMC: 5849509. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001867.
van der Laan L, Garcia-Prats A, Schaaf H, Tikiso T, Wiesner L, de Kock M Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017; 62(2).
PMID: 29133558 PMC: 5786799. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00420-17.