» Articles » PMID: 20538166

Clinical Predictors of Plaque Progression Despite Very Low Levels of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Overview
Date 2010 Jun 12
PMID 20538166
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to characterize the determinants of plaque progression despite achieving very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).

Background: Despite achieving very low levels of LDL-C, many patients continue to demonstrate disease progression and have clinical events.

Methods: A total of 3,437 patients with coronary artery disease underwent serial intravascular ultrasound examination in 7 clinical trials. Patients who achieved an on-treatment LDL-C level of <or=70 mg/dl (n = 951) were stratified as progressors (n = 200) and nonprogressors (n = 751) and compared.

Results: Despite achieving LDL-C <or=70 mg/dl, >20% of patients continued to progress. There were no demographic differences between groups. Progressors demonstrated higher baseline levels of glucose (117.1 +/- 42.5 mg/dl vs. 112.1 +/- 40.0 mg/dl, p = 0.02), triglycerides (157.5 mg/dl vs. 133.0 mg/dl, p = 0.004), and a smaller decrease of apolipoprotein B (-25.1 +/- 3.4 mg/dl vs. -27.4 +/- 3.35 mg/dl, p = 0.01) at follow-up. Multivariable analysis revealed that independently associated risk factors of progression in patients with LDL-C <or=70 mg/dl included baseline percent atheroma volume (p = 0.001), presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.02), increase in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.001), less increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.01), and a smaller decrease in apolipoprotein B levels (p = 0.001), but not changes in C-reactive protein (p = 0.78) or LDL-C (p = 0.84).

Conclusions: Residual risk factors are associated with the likelihood of disease progression in patients who achieve very low LDL-C levels. In addition, the association between apolipoprotein B and atheroma progression highlights the potential importance of LDL particle concentration in patients with optimal LDL-C control. This finding highlights the need for intensive modification of global risk in patients with coronary artery disease.

Citing Articles

Achieving More Optimal Lipid Control with Non-Statin Lipid Lowering Therapy.

Nicholls S, Nelson A Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025; 27(1):32.

PMID: 39954169 PMC: 11829850. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-025-01280-4.


Association between Estimated Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Occurrence of New Lesions after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japanese Patients with Stable Angina and Receiving Statin Therapy.

Kanda D, Tokushige A, Ohishi M Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(6):218.

PMID: 39076334 PMC: 11270076. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2506218.


Role of Lipid-Lowering and Anti-Inflammatory Therapies on Plaque Stabilization.

Bryniarski K, den Dekker W, Legutko J, Gasior P, Tahon J, Diletti R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892807 PMC: 11172633. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113096.


Effect of ezetimibe-statin combination therapy vs. statin monotherapy on coronary atheroma phenotype and lumen stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Zhang Y, Xu M, Duan J, Wang D, Han S Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1343582.

PMID: 38803434 PMC: 11128550. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1343582.


Managing hypercholesterolaemia.

Nelson A, Nicholls S Aust Prescr. 2024; 47(1):7-14.

PMID: 38444897 PMC: 10911836. DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.006.