» Articles » PMID: 20536518

Disparity in Management of Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors by Sex in DCCT/EDIC

Overview
Journal Diabet Med
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2010 Jun 12
PMID 20536518
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. Sex disparity in the treatment of modifiable CHD risk factors in patients with Type 2 diabetes has been reported previously; however, there is little comparable information in Type 1 diabetes.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 1153 subjects with Type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) cohort to compare achievement of metabolic and CHD risk factor goals and use of recommended risk factor interventions between the sexes.

Results: Women were less likely than men to achieve glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)<7.0% [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.995] or<8.0% (AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95). Achievement of target lipid levels was not significantly different between the sexes. As in the non-diabetic population, men had higher blood pressure. Women were significantly less likely than men to report using aspirin (AOR 0.77, 0.60-0.99) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (AOR 0.62, 0.49-0.80) and statins (AOR 0.56, 0.43-0.73), even after adjusting for blood pressure and lipid levels, respectively. Reported use of statins was also lower in women than men in the subset that developed a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level>3.4 mmol/l (39% vs. 60%, P<0.05).

Conclusions: In Type 1 diabetes, women report lower frequency than men in the use of interventions that decrease CHD risk. These findings are consistent with reports in the Type 2 diabetic population, showing that risk-reducing measures are underused in women with diabetes.

Citing Articles

Sex inequalities in cardiovascular risk factors and their management in primary prevention in adults living with type 1 diabetes in Germany and France: findings from DPV and SFDT1.

Cosson E, Auzanneau M, Aguayo G, Karges W, Riveline J, Augstein P Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024; 23(1):342.

PMID: 39285445 PMC: 11406774. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-024-02419-4.


Sex in cardiovascular disease: Why this biological variable should be considered in in vitro models.

McClain A, Monteleone P, Zoldan J Sci Adv. 2024; 10(19):eadn3510.

PMID: 38728407 PMC: 11086622. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn3510.


Differences in lipid and blood pressure measurements between individuals with type 1 diabetes and the general population: a cross-sectional study.

Varkevisser R, Mul D, Aanstoot H, Wolffenbuttel B, van der Klauw M BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e073690.

PMID: 37880169 PMC: 10603478. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073690.


Medication profiling in women with type 1 diabetes highlights the importance of adequate, guideline-based treatment in low-risk groups.

Lithovius R, Mutter S, Parente E, Makinen V, Valo E, Harjutsalo V Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):17893.

PMID: 37857707 PMC: 10587128. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44695-2.


The Influence of Age, Sex, and Socioeconomic Status on Glycemic Control Among People With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in Canada: Patient-Led Longitudinal Retrospective Cross-sectional Study With Multiple Time Points of Measurement.

Mousavi S, Tannenbaum Greenberg D, Ndjaboue R, Greiver M, Drescher O, Chipenda Dansokho S JMIR Diabetes. 2023; 8:e35682.

PMID: 37104030 PMC: 10176138. DOI: 10.2196/35682.