» Articles » PMID: 20535527

Endocrinologic, Neurologic, and Visual Morbidity After Treatment for Craniopharyngioma

Overview
Journal J Neurooncol
Publisher Springer
Date 2010 Jun 11
PMID 20535527
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Craniopharyngiomas are locally aggressive tumors which typically are focused in the sellar and suprasellar region near a number of critical neural and vascular structures mediating endocrinologic, behavioral, and visual functions. The present study aims to summarize and compare the published literature regarding morbidity resulting from treatment of craniopharyngioma. We performed a comprehensive search of the published English language literature to identify studies publishing outcome data of patients undergoing surgery for craniopharyngioma. Comparisons of the rates of endocrine, vascular, neurological, and visual complications were performed using Pearson's chi-squared test, and covariates of interest were fitted into a multivariate logistic regression model. In our data set, 540 patients underwent surgical resection of their tumor. 138 patients received biopsy alone followed by some form of radiotherapy. Mean overall follow-up for all patients in these studies was 54 ± 1.8 months. The overall rate of new endocrinopathy for all patients undergoing surgical resection of their mass was 37% (95% CI = 33-41). Patients receiving GTR had over 2.5 times the rate of developing at least one endocrinopathy compared to patients receiving STR alone or STR + XRT (52 vs. 19 vs. 20%, χ(2) P < 0.00001). On multivariate analysis, GTR conferred a significant increase in the risk of endocrinopathy compared to STR + XRT (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 2.05-5.81, P < 0.00001), after controlling for study size and the presence of significant hypothalamic involvement. There was a statistical trend towards worse visual outcomes in patients receiving XRT after STR compared to GTR or STR alone (GTR = 3.5% vs. STR 2.1% vs. STR + XRT 6.4%, P = 0.11). Given the difficulty in obtaining class 1 data regarding the treatment of this tumor, this study can serve as an estimate of expected outcomes for these patients, and guide decision making until these data are available.

Citing Articles

Differences in Treatment Outcomes Depending on the Adjuvant Treatment Modality in Craniopharyngioma.

Lee B, Cho J, Kim D, Chang J, Kang S, Kim E Yonsei Med J. 2025; 66(3):141-150.

PMID: 39999989 PMC: 11865873. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0566.


Craniopharyngioma in young female patient occurring after ovarian teratoma removal - A case report.

Said A, Abdulahi M, Hassan M, Ismail I, Ahmed A Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025; 128:111022.

PMID: 39929106 PMC: 11849647. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111022.


Integrating Systemic Therapies into the Multimodality Therapy of Patients with Craniopharyngioma.

Gritsch D, Santagata S, Brastianos P Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024; 25(2):261-273.

PMID: 38300480 PMC: 11203386. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01156-2.


Postoperative hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction and long-term hormone replacement in patients with childhood-onset craniopharyngioma.

Miao Y, Fan K, Peng X, Li S, Chen J, Bai R Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1241145.

PMID: 38027203 PMC: 10657986. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1241145.


Vision-related quality of life in patients with childhood-onset craniopharyngioma.

Sowithayasakul P, Beckhaus J, Boekhoff S, Friedrich C, Calaminus G, Muller H Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19599.

PMID: 37949931 PMC: 10638396. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46532-y.


References
1.
Konovalov A, Gorelyshev S . Surgical treatment of anterior third ventricle tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992; 118(1-2):33-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01400724. View

2.
Sorva R, Jaaskinen J, HEISKANEN O, Perheentupa J . Postoperative computed tomographic control of 38 patients with craniopharyngioma. Surg Neurol. 1988; 29(2):115-9. DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(88)90067-5. View

3.
Lonjon M, Dran G, Casagrande F, Vandenbos F, Mas J, Richelme C . Prenatal diagnosis of a craniopharyngioma: a new case with radical surgery and review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004; 21(3):177-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-004-1019-y. View

4.
Keohane C, Hally M, Ryder D, Buckley T . Late recurrence of craniopharyngioma in the cerebellopontine angle in a fertile woman. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994; 57(7):873-4. PMC: 1073047. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.57.7.873. View

5.
Sorva R, HEISKANEN O . Craniopharyngioma in Finland. A study of 123 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1986; 81(3-4):85-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01401226. View