» Articles » PMID: 20534713

Interleukin-1beta Levels, Pain Intensity, and Tooth Movement Using Two Different Magnitudes of Continuous Orthodontic Force

Overview
Journal Eur J Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2010 Jun 11
PMID 20534713
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to determine the optimum orthodontic force from a broader perspective. Interleukin (IL)-1β levels in human gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), pain intensity, and the amount of tooth movement were measured during canine retraction using different magnitudes of continuous orthodontic force. Sixteen subjects (two males and 14 females), aged 18-24 years, diagnosed with Class I bimaxillary protrusion and treated with first premolar extractions participated in this study. The upper canines were retracted with continuous forces of 50 or 150 g using nickel-titanium coil springs on segmented archwires. One of the lower canines was used as a control. GCF was collected from the distal site of each tooth at specific time points. IL-1β concentrations, pain intensity, using the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the amount of tooth movement were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance, Friedman, and paired t-tests were used for comparisons of IL-1β in GCF, the plaque and gingival indices, and the efficiency of tooth movement on pain perception, respectively. IL-1β concentration in the 150 g group showed the highest level at 24 hours and 2 months with significant differences compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The mean VAS score of pain intensity from the 150 g force was significantly greater than from the 50 g force at 24 hours (P < 0.01). However, no significant difference in the amount of tooth movement was found between these two different magnitudes of continuous force at 2 months. A 50 g force could effectively induce tooth movement similar to 150 g with less pain and less inflammation.

Citing Articles

Effect of Mechanical Force Stress on the Inflammatory Response in Human Periodontal Ligament Cells.

Rojasawasthien T, Srithanyarat S, Bulanawichit W, Osathanon T Int Dent J. 2024; 75(1):117-126.

PMID: 39730290 PMC: 11806315. DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.12.001.


Does the pain experienced during orthodontic treatment and bracket removal depend on the architecture of the bracket or debonding method?.

Gibas-Stanek M, Fudalej P Eur J Orthod. 2024; 47(1).

PMID: 39665482 PMC: 11635638. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjae073.


Nociceptor mechanisms underlying pain and bone remodeling via orthodontic forces: toward no pain, big gain.

Wang S, Ko C, Chung M Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024; 5:1365194.

PMID: 38455874 PMC: 10917994. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1365194.


Effectiveness of laser-engineered copper-nickel titanium versus superelastic nickel-titanium aligning archwires: A randomized clinical trial.

Ahmed O, Kadhum A Korean J Orthod. 2023; 54(1):16-25.

PMID: 38008906 PMC: 10811358. DOI: 10.4041/kjod23.081.


Comparative analysis of periodontal pain and quality of life in patients with fixed multibracket appliances and aligners (Invisalign®): longitudinal clinical study.

Alvarado-Lorenzo A, Antonio-Zancajo L, Baptista H, Colino Gallardo P, Albaladejo-Martinez A, Garcovich D BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):850.

PMID: 37951878 PMC: 10638788. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03565-z.