» Articles » PMID: 20534140

Effectiveness of Individualized Physiotherapy on Pain and Functioning Compared to a Standard Exercise Protocol in Patients Presenting with Clinical Signs of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2010 Jun 11
PMID 20534140
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Shoulder impingement syndrome is a common musculoskeletal complaint leading to significant reduction of health and disability. Physiotherapy is often the first choice of treatment although its effectiveness is still under debate. Systematic reviews in this field highlight the need for more high quality trials to investigate the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.

Methods/design: This randomized controlled trial will investigate the effectiveness of individualized physiotherapy in patients presenting with clinical signs and symptoms of subacromial impingement, involving 90 participants aged 18-75. Participants are recruited from outpatient physiotherapy clinics, general practitioners, and orthopaedic surgeons in Germany. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either individualized physiotherapy or to a standard exercise protocol using central randomization. The control group will perform the standard exercise protocol aiming to restore muscular deficits in strength, mobility, and coordination of the rotator cuff and the shoulder girdle muscles to unload the subacromial space during active movements. Participants of the intervention group will perform the standard exercise protocol as a home program, and will additionally be treated with individualized physiotherapy based on clinical examination results, and guided by a decision tree. After the intervention phase both groups will continue their home program for another 7 weeks. Outcome will be measured at 5 weeks and at 3 and 12 months after inclusion using the shoulder pain and disability index and patients' global impression of change, the generic patient-specific scale, the average weekly pain score, and patient satisfaction with treatment. Additionally, the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire, the pain catastrophizing scale, and patients' expectancies of treatment effect are assessed. Participants' adherence to the protocol, use of additional treatments for the shoulder, direct and indirect costs, and sick leave due to shoulder complaints will be recorded in a shoulder log-book.

Discussion: To our knowledge this is the first trial comparing individualized physiotherapy based on a defined decision making process to a standardized exercise protocol. Using high-quality methodologies, this trial will add evidence to the limited body of knowledge about the effect of physiotherapy in patients with SIS.

Citing Articles

An Experimental and Clinical Physiological Signal Dataset for Automated Pain Recognition.

Gouverneur P, Badura A, Li F, Bienkowska M, Luebke L, Adamczyk W Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):1051.

PMID: 39333541 PMC: 11436824. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-03878-w.


Factors predicting long-term outcomes following physiotherapy in patients with subacromial pain syndrome: a secondary analysis.

Kromer T, Kohl M, Bastiaenen C BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):579.

PMID: 39048996 PMC: 11267964. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07686-6.


Arthroscopic subacromial decompression improved outcomes in situationally depressed patients compared to clinically depressed or nondepressed patients.

Greif D, Shaikh H, Neumanitis J, Ramirez G, Maloney M, Bronstein R JSES Int. 2024; 8(2):304-309.

PMID: 38464455 PMC: 10920123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.012.


A Systemic Review on Nutraceutical Supplements used in the Management of Osteoarthritis.

Nooreen Z, Wal P, Summaiyya F Recent Adv Food Nutr Agric. 2024; 15(1):33-45.

PMID: 38258782 DOI: 10.2174/012772574X270405231102054920.


Specific versus general exercise programme in adults with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Gutierrez Espinoza H, Araya-Quintanilla F, Pinto-Concha S, Valenzuela-Fuenzalida J, Lopez-Gil J, Ramirez-Velez R BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023; 9(3):e001646.

PMID: 37780129 PMC: 10537831. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001646.


References
1.
Meyer K, Sprott H, Mannion A . Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Psychosom Res. 2008; 64(5):469-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.12.004. View

2.
Michener L, Walsworth M, Burnet E . Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2004; 17(2):152-64. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.004. View

3.
Reddy A, Mohr K, Pink M, Jobe F . Electromyographic analysis of the deltoid and rotator cuff muscles in persons with subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 9(6):519-23. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2000.109410. View

4.
Peters D, Davies P, Pietroni P . Musculoskeletal clinic in general practice: study of one year's referrals. Br J Gen Pract. 1994; 44(378):25-9. PMC: 1238758. View

5.
Crombez G, Vlaeyen J, Heuts P, Lysens R . Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain. 1999; 80(1-2):329-39. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(98)00229-2. View