» Articles » PMID: 20530853

Computing Effective Dose in Cardiac CT

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2010 Jun 10
PMID 20530853
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a method of estimating effective doses in cardiac CT that accounts for selected techniques (kV mAs(-1)), anatomical location of the scan and patient size. A CT dosimetry spreadsheet (ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator) was used to estimate effective doses (E) using ICRP 103 weighting factors for a 70 kg patient undergoing cardiac CT examinations. Using dose length product (DLP) for the same scans, we obtained values of E/DLP for three CT scanners used in cardiac imaging from two vendors. E/DLP ratios were obtained as a function of the anatomical location in the chest and for x-ray tube voltages ranging from 80 to 140 kV. We also computed the ratio of the average absorbed dose in a water cylinder modeling a patient weighing W kg to the corresponding average absorbed dose in a water cylinder equivalent to a 70 kg patient. The average E/DLP for a 16 cm cardiac heart CT scan was 26 microSv (mGy cm)(-1), which is about 70% higher than the current E/DLP values used for chest CT scans (i.e. 14-17 microSv (mGy cm)(-1)). Our cardiac E/DLP ratios are higher because the cardiac region is approximately 30% more radiosensitive than the chest, and use of the ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors increases cardiac CT effective doses by approximately 30%. Increasing the x-ray tube voltage from 80 to 140 kV increases the E/DLP conversion factor for cardiac CT by 17%. For the same incident radiation at 120 kV, doses in 45 kg adults were approximately 22% higher than those in 70 kg adults, whereas doses in 120 kg adults were approximately 28% lower. Accurate estimates of the patient effective dose in cardiac CT should use ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors, and account for a choice of scan techniques (kV mAs(-1)), exposed scan region, as well as patient size.

Citing Articles

Optimizing acute chest pain diagnosis: Efficacy of 64-channel multi-slice CT with Snap-Shot Freeze technique in Triple-Rule-out CT angiography.

Feng J, Zeng J, Xu Q, Lu J, Pei Y, Zhang X Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40642.

PMID: 39669141 PMC: 11635669. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40642.


Radiation Doses in Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.

Kedzierski B, Macek P, Dziadkowiec-Macek B, Truszkiewicz K, Poreba R, Gac P Life (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37109519 PMC: 10141413. DOI: 10.3390/life13040990.


Gender based lung cancer risks for symptomatic coronary artery disease patients undergone cardiac CT.

Dalah E, Obaideen A, Anam S, Alzimami K, Jambi L, Bradley D PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0265609.

PMID: 35404962 PMC: 9000096. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265609.


A comparison study of radiation effective dose in ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography and calcium scoring examinations performed with a dual-source CT scanner.

Sabarudin A, Siong T, Chin A, Hoong N, Abdul Karim M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):4374.

PMID: 30867480 PMC: 6416329. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40758-5.


Radiation Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.

Bonilha H, Huda W, Wilmskoetter J, Martin-Harris B, Tipnis S Dysphagia. 2019; 34(6):922-929.

PMID: 30830303 PMC: 6722025. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-019-09993-w.