Computing Effective Dose in Cardiac CT
Overview
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Affiliations
We present a method of estimating effective doses in cardiac CT that accounts for selected techniques (kV mAs(-1)), anatomical location of the scan and patient size. A CT dosimetry spreadsheet (ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator) was used to estimate effective doses (E) using ICRP 103 weighting factors for a 70 kg patient undergoing cardiac CT examinations. Using dose length product (DLP) for the same scans, we obtained values of E/DLP for three CT scanners used in cardiac imaging from two vendors. E/DLP ratios were obtained as a function of the anatomical location in the chest and for x-ray tube voltages ranging from 80 to 140 kV. We also computed the ratio of the average absorbed dose in a water cylinder modeling a patient weighing W kg to the corresponding average absorbed dose in a water cylinder equivalent to a 70 kg patient. The average E/DLP for a 16 cm cardiac heart CT scan was 26 microSv (mGy cm)(-1), which is about 70% higher than the current E/DLP values used for chest CT scans (i.e. 14-17 microSv (mGy cm)(-1)). Our cardiac E/DLP ratios are higher because the cardiac region is approximately 30% more radiosensitive than the chest, and use of the ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors increases cardiac CT effective doses by approximately 30%. Increasing the x-ray tube voltage from 80 to 140 kV increases the E/DLP conversion factor for cardiac CT by 17%. For the same incident radiation at 120 kV, doses in 45 kg adults were approximately 22% higher than those in 70 kg adults, whereas doses in 120 kg adults were approximately 28% lower. Accurate estimates of the patient effective dose in cardiac CT should use ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors, and account for a choice of scan techniques (kV mAs(-1)), exposed scan region, as well as patient size.
Feng J, Zeng J, Xu Q, Lu J, Pei Y, Zhang X Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40642.
PMID: 39669141 PMC: 11635669. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40642.
Radiation Doses in Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.
Kedzierski B, Macek P, Dziadkowiec-Macek B, Truszkiewicz K, Poreba R, Gac P Life (Basel). 2023; 13(4).
PMID: 37109519 PMC: 10141413. DOI: 10.3390/life13040990.
Dalah E, Obaideen A, Anam S, Alzimami K, Jambi L, Bradley D PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0265609.
PMID: 35404962 PMC: 9000096. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265609.
Sabarudin A, Siong T, Chin A, Hoong N, Abdul Karim M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):4374.
PMID: 30867480 PMC: 6416329. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40758-5.
Radiation Risks to Adult Patients Undergoing Modified Barium Swallow Studies.
Bonilha H, Huda W, Wilmskoetter J, Martin-Harris B, Tipnis S Dysphagia. 2019; 34(6):922-929.
PMID: 30830303 PMC: 6722025. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-019-09993-w.