» Articles » PMID: 20528781

Intraoperative Mitomycin C Versus Autologous Conjunctival Autograft in Surgery of Primary Pterygium with Four-year Follow-up

Overview
Journal Acta Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2010 Jun 10
PMID 20528781
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the 4-year outcome of primary pterygium excision using intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) with suturing a free conjunctival autograft (CA).

Methods: A total of 115 eyes with nasal primary pterygium of 115 patients were included in the study. After randomization into two groups, the eyes were operated on by a single surgeon (GK). After excision of the pterygium, 56 eyes received 0.04% MMC intraoperatively on the bare sclera for 3 min and 59 eyes received a free CA sutured using 7-0 Vicryl. Postoperative follow-up was 4 years. Main outcome measures were recurrences, re-operations, surgery time, complications, visual acuity and astigmatism. Statistical evaluation was performed with the chi-squared test.

Results: The recurrence rate was 38% in the MMC group and 15% in the CA group (p < 0.05). The re-operation rate of the recurrences was 53% in the MMC group and 29% in the CA group. Average surgery time was 13 minutes (range: 6-22 min) in the MMC group and 26 min (range: 18-32 min) in the CA group (p < 0.01). There was no significant change in best-corrected visual acuity and astigmatism. One major complication occurred in each group. The most frequently observed complication was delayed epithelial healing (40%) and mild scleral thinning (20%) in the MMC group and suture-related inflammation in the CA group (10%).

Conclusion: Pterygium surgery including free autologous conjunctival grafting is associated with fewer recurrences, re-operations and complications than using the bare sclera technique together with single-dose intraoperative MMC.

Citing Articles

The efficacy of bandage contact lens in relieving the aggravation of dry eye disease after complicated cataract or/and IOL surgery.

Chen D, Xu D, Wu X, Wang J, Sheng S, Yu X BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):141.

PMID: 38549070 PMC: 10976755. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03385-x.


Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Different Pterygium Surgeries: A Review of the Literature.

Palewski M, Budnik A, Konopinska J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18).

PMID: 36141628 PMC: 9517485. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811357.


Membrane of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors in Primary Pterygium Surgery Compared to Amniotic Membrane Transplantation and Conjunctival Autograft.

Idoipe M, De La Sen-Corcuera B, Sanchez-Avila R, Sanchez-Perez C, Satue M, Sanchez-Perez A J Clin Med. 2021; 10(23).

PMID: 34884413 PMC: 8658705. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235711.


Pterygium: an update on pathophysiology, clinical features, and management.

Shahraki T, Arabi A, Feizi S Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021; 13:25158414211020152.

PMID: 34104871 PMC: 8170279. DOI: 10.1177/25158414211020152.


Efficacy of bevacizumab injection after pterygium excision and limbal conjunctival autograft with limbal fixation suture.

Yang H, Lee Y, Hyon J, Kim K, Han S Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020; 258(7):1451-1457.

PMID: 32333103 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04704-w.