» Articles » PMID: 20525010

Effects of Concurrent Working Memory Load on Distractor and Conflict Processing in a Name-face Stroop Task

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 Jun 8
PMID 20525010
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To examine the time course of effects of working memory (WM) load on interference control, ERPs were measured in a combined WM and Stroop task. A WM load of 0, 2, or 4 letters was imposed, and during the maintenance-interval Stroop trials were presented that required participants to classify names of famous people while ignoring faces that were either congruent or incongruent with the names. Behavioral interference was not modulated by WM load, but WM load led to an overall reduction of Stroop stimulus encoding as reflected by reduced N170 and N250 amplitudes independent of congruency. Incongruent distractor faces induced interference as shown by a delayed and reduced positivity between 480-600 ms (N450) and an enhanced positivity between 760-1000 ms (P600), indicating longer stimulus evaluation, conflict detection, and conflict resolution, respectively. WM load led to an increase of the P600 at frontal and parietal sites, possibly reflecting PFC-driven top-down control of posterior sites, necessary for conflict resolution.

Citing Articles

Semantic Stroop interference is modulated by the availability of executive resources: Insights from delta-plot analyses and cognitive load manipulation.

Sulpizio S, Spinelli G, Scaltritti M Mem Cognit. 2024; 52(6):1422-1438.

PMID: 38530621 PMC: 11362381. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01552-5.


Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.

De Fockert J Front Psychol. 2013; 4:287.

PMID: 23734139 PMC: 3659333. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00287.


Working memory templates are maintained as feature-specific perceptual codes.

Sreenivasan K, Sambhara D, Jha A J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106(1):115-21.

PMID: 21511708 PMC: 3129724. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00776.2010.