» Articles » PMID: 20521117

"Just One Animal Among Many?" Existential Phenomenology, Ethics, and Stem Cell Research

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2010 Jun 4
PMID 20521117
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stem cell research and associated or derivative biotechnologies are proceeding at a pace that has left bioethics behind as a discipline that is more or less reactionary to their developments. Further, much of the available ethical deliberation remains determined by the conceptual framework of late modern metaphysics and the correlative ethical theories of utilitarianism and deontology. Lacking, to any meaningful extent, is a sustained engagement with ontological and epistemological critiques, such as with "postmodern" thinking like that of Heidegger's existential phenomenology. Some basic "Heideggerian" conceptual strategies are reviewed here as a way of remedying this deficiency and adding to ethical deliberation about current stem cell research practices.

References
1.
Yamanaka S . Pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008; 363(1500):2079-87. PMC: 2610180. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.2261. View

2.
Brock D . Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles. J Med Ethics. 2006; 32(1):36-42. PMC: 2563268. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.013581. View

3.
Resnik D, Shamoo A, Krimsky S . Fraudulent human embryonic stem cell research in South Korea: lessons learned. Account Res. 2006; 13(1):101-9. PMC: 1892198. DOI: 10.1080/08989620600634193. View

4.
Graumann S . Experts on philosophical reflection in public discourse--the German Sloterdijk debate as an example. Biomed Ethics. 2002; 5(1):27-33. View

5.
Mauron A . Renovating the house of being: genomes, souls, and selves. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003; 1001:240-52. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1279.013. View