» Articles » PMID: 20513325

Patients' Perception and Future Acceptance of an Artificial Pancreas

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2010 Jun 2
PMID 20513325
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Little is known of patient acceptance of an artificial pancreas (AP). The purpose of this study was to investigate future acceptance of an AP and its determinants.

Methods: Patients with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy were interviewed using questions based on the technology acceptance model and completed the diabetes treatment and satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ).

Results: Twenty-two adults with type 1 diabetes participated. Half of the patients were followed in a university hospital, and the others were under treatment in an affiliated teaching hospital. Half of the patients were male. The mean DTSQ score was 29 (range 23-33). The AP was perceived as likely to be useful. Perceived advantages were a stable glucose regulation, less need for self-monitoring of blood glucose, relief of daily concerns, and time saving. Participants were confident in their capability to use the system. Although many participants (58%) had been reluctant to start continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, the majority (79%) felt they would have no barriers to start using the AP. Trust in the AP was related to the quality of glucose control it would provide. Almost everyone expressed the intention to use the new system when available, even if it would initially not cover 24/24 hours.

Conclusion: The overall attitude on the AP was positive. Intention to use was dependent on trust in the AP, which was related to the quality of glucose control provided by the AP.

Citing Articles

Effect of automated insulin delivery systems on person-reported outcomes in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Roos T, Hermanns N, Gross C, Kulzer B, Haak T, Ehrmann D EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 76:102852.

PMID: 39364272 PMC: 11447321. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102852.


Future acceptance of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes: validation of the Italian artificial pancreas-acceptance measure.

Franceschi R, Pertile R, Marigliano M, Mozzillo E, Maffeis C, Zaffani S Acta Diabetol. 2024; 62(2):177-183.

PMID: 39126517 PMC: 11861114. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9.


The Path From Awareness to Action: Exploring Diabetic Patients' Awareness and Attitudes and Barriers to Utilization of Artificial Pancreas in the Beheira Governorate, Egypt.

Hafez S, Mohammed N, Yahia Mahdy Shalby A, Eltaher Hamed Abdulrahman E, AlQarni A, Ayed Alhamami F Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e52703.

PMID: 38384620 PMC: 10879912. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52703.


Study protocol for a randomised open-label clinical trial examining the safety and efficacy of the Android Artificial Pancreas System (AAPS) with advanced bolus-free features in adults with type 1 diabetes: the 'CLOSE IT' (Closed Loop Open SourcE In....

Wilkinson T, Tomic D, Boyle E, Burren D, Elghattis Y, Jenkins A BMJ Open. 2024; 14(2):e078171.

PMID: 38382954 PMC: 10882371. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078171.


Measures of Patient-Reported Expectations, Acceptance, and Satisfaction Using Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: A Review.

Marigliano M, Mozzillo E, Mancioppi V, Candia F, Rosanio F, Antonelli A J Pers Med. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37511644 PMC: 10382040. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071031.


References
1.
Maia F, Araujo L . Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) to detect postprandial hyperglycemia and unrecognized hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006; 75(1):30-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.05.009. View

2.
Tamborlane W, Beck R, Bode B, Buckingham B, Peter Chase H, Clemons R . Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(14):1464-76. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017. View

3.
. Youth and parent satisfaction with clinical use of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer in the management of pediatric type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(8):1929-35. PMC: 1414784. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.8.1929. View

4.
Wentholt I, Maran A, Masurel N, Heine R, Hoekstra J, DeVries J . Nocturnal hypoglycaemia in Type 1 diabetic patients, assessed with continuous glucose monitoring: frequency, duration and associations. Diabet Med. 2007; 24(5):527-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02107.x. View

5.
Kowalski A . Can we really close the loop and how soon? Accelerating the availability of an artificial pancreas: a roadmap to better diabetes outcomes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009; 11 Suppl 1:S113-9. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2009.0031. View