» Articles » PMID: 20513082

Performance of the Abbott RealTime High-risk HPV Test in Women with Abnormal Cervical Cytology Smears

Overview
Journal J Med Virol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2010 Jun 1
PMID 20513082
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

HPV DNA testing is known to be much more sensitive than cytology, but less specific. A range of HPV and related tests in 858 women referred for colposcopy because of an abnormal smear were evaluated to compare the performances of these tests. This article compared the Abbott test to other tests which had been previously evaluated. This test was a real true test for 14 high-risk HPV types. The Abbott test was found to be highly sensitive for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) (98.9%) with a specificity of 31.5%. These numbers were comparable with the Qiagen HC2 test, the Roche Linear Array and Amplicor tests, and the Gen-Probe APTIMA test. Differences between these tests appeared to be related mostly to the choice of cutoff level. An added feature of the Abbott test was the provision of type specific results for HPV 16 and 18.

Citing Articles

Human papillomavirus detection using the Abbott RealTime high-risk HPV tests compared with conventional nested PCR coupled to high-throughput sequencing of amplification products in cervical smear specimens from a Gabonese female population.

Moussavou-Boundzanga P, Koumakpayi I, Labouba I, Leroy E, Belembaogo E, Berthet N Virol J. 2017; 14(1):241.

PMID: 29268766 PMC: 5740888. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-017-0906-2.


Study-based evaluation of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in comparison to the HC2 HR HPV test in women aged ≥30 years using residual LBC ThinPrep specimens.

Iftner T, Wang L, Iftner A, Holz B, Haedicke-Jarboui J, Iftner N BMC Infect Dis. 2016; 16(1):672.

PMID: 27835974 PMC: 5106810. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1994-0.


A comparison of different human papillomavirus tests in PreservCyt versus SurePath in a referral population-PREDICTORS 4.

Cuzick J, Ahmad A, Austin J, Cadman L, Ho L, Terry G J Clin Virol. 2016; 82:145-151.

PMID: 27498250 PMC: 4994427. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2016.06.015.


Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 with the PGMY-CHUV assay for human papillomavirus genotyping.

Estrade C, Sahli R J Clin Microbiol. 2014; 52(2):607-12.

PMID: 24478495 PMC: 3911335. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02749-13.


Comparing the Performance of Hybrid Capture II and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for the Identification of Cervical Dysplasia in the Screening and Diagnostic Settings.

Luu H, Adler-Storthz K, Dillon L, Follen M, Scheurer M Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2013; 7:247-55.

PMID: 24137052 PMC: 3795532. DOI: 10.4137/CMO.S12811.