» Articles » PMID: 20510405

Representational Momentum for the Human Body: Awkwardness Matters, Experience Does Not

Overview
Journal Cognition
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2010 Jun 1
PMID 20510405
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Perception of the human body appears to involve predictive simulations that project forward to track unfolding body-motion events. Here we use representational momentum (RM) to investigate whether implicit knowledge of a learned arbitrary system of body movement such as sign language influences this prediction process, and how this compares to implicit knowledge of biomechanics. Experiment 1 showed greater RM for sign language stimuli in the correct direction of the sign than in the reverse direction, but unexpectedly this held true for non-signers as well as signers. Experiment 2 supported two biomechanical explanations for this result (an effect of downward movement, and an effect of the direction that the movement had actually been performed by the model), and Experiments 3 and 4 found no residual enhancement of RM in signers when these factors were controlled. In fact, surprisingly, the opposite was found: signers showed reduced RM for signs. Experiment 5 verified the effect of biomechanical knowledge by testing arm movements that are easy to perform in one direction but awkward in the reverse direction, and found greater RM for the easy direction. We conclude that while perceptual prediction is shaped by implicit knowledge of biomechanics (the awkwardness effect), it is surprisingly insensitive to expectations derived from learned movement patterns. Results are discussed in terms of recent findings on the mirror system.

Citing Articles

Prior knowledge biases the visual memory of body postures.

Han Q, Gandolfo M, Peelen M iScience. 2024; 27(4):109475.

PMID: 38550990 PMC: 10973682. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109475.


Relationships between the magnitude of representational momentum and the spatial and temporal anticipatory judgments of opponent's kicks in taekwondo.

Imanaka K, Sugi T, Nakamoto H Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1193116.

PMID: 37809301 PMC: 10551154. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193116.


Representational Momentum in the Expertise Context: Support for the Theory of Event Coding as an Explanation for Action Anticipation.

Anderson D, Gottwald V, Lawrence G Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1838.

PMID: 31474903 PMC: 6702514. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01838.


Typical action perception and interpretation without motor simulation.

Vannuscorps G, Caramazza A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 113(1):86-91.

PMID: 26699468 PMC: 4711885. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1516978112.


When anticipation beats accuracy: Threat alters memory for dynamic scenes.

Greenstein M, Franklin N, Martins M, Sewack C, Meier M Mem Cognit. 2015; 44(4):633-49.

PMID: 26698159 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0582-7.


References
1.
Saunier G, Papaxanthis C, Vargas C, Pozzo T . Inference of complex human motion requires internal models of action: behavioral evidence. Exp Brain Res. 2007; 185(3):399-409. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1162-2. View

2.
Halpern A, Kelly M . Memory biases in left versus right implied motion. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993; 19(2):471-84. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.2.471. View

3.
Stevens J, Fonlupt P, Shiffrar M, Decety J . New aspects of motion perception: selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. Neuroreport. 2000; 11(1):109-15. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200001170-00022. View

4.
Freyd J . Dynamic mental representations. Psychol Rev. 1987; 94(4):427-38. View

5.
Shmuelof L, Zohary E . Watching others' actions: mirror representations in the parietal cortex. Neuroscientist. 2007; 13(6):667-72. DOI: 10.1177/1073858407302457. View