» Articles » PMID: 20504814

Interactions Between Rate Processes with Different Timescales Explain Counterintuitive Foraging Patterns of Arctic Wintering Eiders

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 May 28
PMID 20504814
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To maximize fitness, animals must respond to a variety of processes that operate at different rates or timescales. Appropriate decisions could therefore involve complex interactions among these processes. For example, eiders wintering in the arctic sea ice must consider locomotion and physiology of diving for benthic invertebrates, digestive processing rate and a nonlinear decrease in profitability of diving as currents increase over the tidal cycle. Using a multi-scale dynamic modelling approach and continuous field observations of individuals, we demonstrate that the strategy that maximizes long-term energy gain involves resting during the most profitable foraging period (slack currents). These counterintuitive foraging patterns are an adaptive trade-off between multiple overlapping rate processes and cannot be explained by classical rate-maximizing optimization theory, which only considers a single timescale and predicts a constant rate of foraging. By reducing foraging and instead digesting during slack currents, eiders structure their activity in order to maximize long-term energetic gain over an entire tide cycle. This study reveals how counterintuitive patterns and a complex functional response can result from a simple trade-off among several overlapping rate processes, emphasizing the necessity of a multi-scale approach for understanding adaptive routines in the wild and evaluating mechanisms in ecological time series.

Citing Articles

Favorable spring conditions can buffer the impact of winter carryover effects on a key breeding decision in an Arctic-breeding seabird.

Steenweg R, Crossin G, Hennin H, Gilchrist H, Love O Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(2):e8588.

PMID: 35154656 PMC: 8826066. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8588.


The evolutionary origins of Lévy walk foraging.

Wosniack M, Santos M, Raposo E, Viswanathan G, da Luz M PLoS Comput Biol. 2017; 13(10):e1005774.

PMID: 28972973 PMC: 5640246. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005774.


Testing optimal foraging theory in a penguin-krill system.

Watanabe Y, Ito M, Takahashi A Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1779):20132376.

PMID: 24478293 PMC: 3924065. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2376.


High corticosterone, not high energy cost, correlates with reproductive success in the burrow-nesting ancient murrelet.

Shoji A, Elliott K, OReilly K, Gaston A PLoS One. 2014; 8(12):e84280.

PMID: 24391929 PMC: 3877242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084280.


Daily foraging patterns in free-living birds: exploring the predation-starvation trade-off.

Bonter D, Zuckerberg B, Sedgwick C, Hochachka W Proc Biol Sci. 2013; 280(1760):20123087.

PMID: 23595267 PMC: 3652453. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.3087.


References
1.
Williams T, Davis R, Fuiman L, Francis J, Le Boeuf B, Horning M . Sink or swim: strategies for cost-efficient diving by marine mammals. Science. 2001; 288(5463):133-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5463.133. View

2.
Butler P, Turner D, Bevan R . Regional distribution of blood flow during swimming in the tufted duck (Aythya fuligula). J Exp Biol. 1988; 135:461-72. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.135.1.461. View

3.
Charnov E . Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol. 1976; 9(2):129-36. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x. View

4.
Weiner J . Physiological limits to sustainable energy budgets in birds and mammals: Ecological implications. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 7(11):384-8. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90009-Z. View

5.
McNamara J, Houston A . Optimal annual routines: behaviour in the context of physiology and ecology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007; 363(1490):301-19. PMC: 2606752. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2141. View