Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Versus Delayed Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging--value in Detection
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To retrospectively compare non-echo-planar (non-EP) diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging, delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and the combination of both techniques in the evaluation of patients with cholesteatoma.
Materials And Methods: This institutional review board-approved study, for which the need to obtain informed consent was waived, included 57 patients clinically suspected of having a middle ear cholesteatoma without a history of surgery and 63 patients imaged before "second-look" surgery. Four blinded radiologists evaluated three sets of MR images: a set of delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, a set of non-EP DW images, and a set of both kinds of images. Overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV), as well as intra- and interobserver agreement, were assessed and compared among methods. To correct for the correlation between different readings, a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model was fitted. Results were compared with surgical results, which were regarded as the standard of reference.
Results: Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were significantly different between the three methods (P < .005). Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were 56.7% and 67.6% with the delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images and 82.6% and 87.2% with the non-EP DW images. Sensitivity for the combination of both kinds of images was 84.2%, while specificity was 88.2%. The overall PPV was 88.0% for delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, 96.0% for non-EP DW images, and 96.3%for the combination of both kinds of images. The overall NPV was 27.0% for delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, 56.5% for non-EP DW images, and 59.6% for the combination of both kinds of images.
Conclusion: MR imaging for detection of middle ear cholesteatoma can be performed by using non-EP DW imaging sequences alone. Use of the non-EP DW imaging sequence combined with a delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequence yielded no significant increases in sensitivity, specificity, NPV, or PPV over the use of the non-EP DW imaging sequence alone.
MRI-DWI detection of residual cholesteatoma: moving toward an optimum follow-up scheme.
Eggink M, de Wolf M, Ebbens F, de Win M, Dikkers F, van Spronsen E Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 282(2):659-668.
PMID: 39269619 PMC: 11805829. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08939-9.
Beyond the otoscope: an imaging review of congenital cholesteatoma.
Vangrinsven G, Bernaerts A, Deckers F, van Dinther J, Zarowski A, De Foer B Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):194.
PMID: 39112725 PMC: 11306902. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01761-1.
Follow-up strategies in pediatric cholesteatoma: a systematic review.
Molinari G, Reale M, Albera A, Russo F, Di Lullo A, Gaffuri M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024; 282(1):11-22.
PMID: 39097857 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08875-8.
Erfurt C, Westerhout S, Straatman L, Smit A, Stokroos R, Thomeer H Front Surg. 2024; 11:1381481.
PMID: 38650663 PMC: 11033303. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1381481.
Xun M, Liu X, Sha Y, Zhang X, Liu J Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023; 8(3):627-635.
PMID: 37342121 PMC: 10278117. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1032.