» Articles » PMID: 20500887

Some Novel Intron Positions in Conserved Drosophila Genes Are Caused by Intron Sliding or Tandem Duplication

Overview
Journal BMC Evol Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2010 May 27
PMID 20500887
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Positions of spliceosomal introns are often conserved between remotely related genes. Introns that reside in non-conserved positions are either novel or remnants of frequent losses of introns in some evolutionary lineages. A recent gain of such introns is difficult to prove. However, introns verified as novel are needed to evaluate contemporary processes of intron gain.

Results: We identified 25 unambiguous cases of novel intron positions in 31 Drosophila genes that exhibit near intron pairs (NIPs). Here, a NIP consists of an ancient and a novel intron position that are separated by less than 32 nt. Within a single gene, such closely-spaced introns are very unlikely to have coexisted. In most cases, therefore, the ancient intron position must have disappeared in favour of the novel one. A survey for NIPs among 12 Drosophila genomes identifies intron sliding (migration) as one of the more frequent causes of novel intron positions. Other novel introns seem to have been gained by regional tandem duplications of coding sequences containing a proto-splice site.

Conclusions: Recent intron gains sometimes appear to have arisen by duplication of exonic sequences and subsequent intronization of one of the copies. Intron migration and exon duplication together may account for a significant amount of novel intron positions in conserved coding sequences.

Citing Articles

Bi-alignments with affine gaps costs.

Stadler P, Will S Algorithms Mol Biol. 2022; 17(1):10.

PMID: 35578255 PMC: 9109335. DOI: 10.1186/s13015-022-00219-7.


The evolution of hemocyanin genes in Tectipleura: a multitude of conserved introns in highly diverse gastropods.

Schafer G, Pedrini-Martha V, Jackson D, Dallinger R, Lieb B BMC Ecol Evol. 2021; 21(1):36.

PMID: 33663373 PMC: 7931591. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01763-3.


Is there any intron sliding in mammals?.

Poverennaya I, Potapova N, Spirin S BMC Evol Biol. 2020; 20(1):164.

PMID: 33308147 PMC: 7730772. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-020-01726-0.


A mechanism for a single nucleotide intron shift.

Fekete E, Flipphi M, Ag N, Kavalecz N, Cerqueira G, Scazzocchio C Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(15):9085-9092.

PMID: 28595329 PMC: 5587772. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx520.


Plant Actin-Depolymerizing Factors Possess Opposing Biochemical Properties Arising from Key Amino Acid Changes throughout Evolution.

Nan Q, Qian D, Niu Y, He Y, Tong S, Niu Z Plant Cell. 2017; 29(2):395-408.

PMID: 28123105 PMC: 5354190. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.16.00690.


References
1.
Coulombe-Huntington J, Majewski J . Intron loss and gain in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24(12):2842-50. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm235. View

2.
Lim L, Burge C . A computational analysis of sequence features involved in recognition of short introns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(20):11193-8. PMC: 58706. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.201407298. View

3.
Carmel L, Wolf Y, Rogozin I, Koonin E . Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. Genome Res. 2007; 17(7):1034-44. PMC: 1899114. DOI: 10.1101/gr.6438607. View

4.
Roy S, Penny D . A very high fraction of unique intron positions in the intron-rich diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana indicates widespread intron gain. Mol Biol Evol. 2007; 24(7):1447-57. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm048. View

5.
Roy S, Irimia M . Mystery of intron gain: new data and new models. Trends Genet. 2008; 25(2):67-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2008.11.004. View