» Articles » PMID: 20500077

Variations in Velopharyngeal Structures Between Upright and Supine Positions Using Upright Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Overview
Date 2010 May 27
PMID 20500077
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: No studies have used MRI to compare the dimensional changes of the velopharyngeal musculature between upright and supine positions. The purpose of this study is to provide a comparison between structures of the velopharyngeal mechanism while in the supine and upright positions during rest and sustained speech productions of four female subjects.

Methods: Four healthy white female subjects between 30 and 36 years of age (mean, 32.5 ± 1.75 years) were imaged using a 0.6-tesla open-type multi-position MRI scanner. Subjects produced two speech tasks (/i/ and /s/) in the two body positions.

Results: Velar measures (length, thickness, and height), pharyngeal measures (retrovelar and retrolingual), and levator muscle measures (length and angles of origin) demonstrated a small variation between upright and supine positions. Differences in velar height during production of /i/ between the two positions was significant for all subjects. In most cases, the velar thickness remained nearly the same (group mean difference was between -0.2 and 1.2 mm). Group means demonstrated an average levator muscle shortening from upright to supine of 2.8 mm at rest, 2.0 mm during /i/ production, and 2.3 mm during /s/ production. Percentage of levator shortening were 17% for /i/ production and 21% for /s/ production, which were independent of body position.

Conclusions: Overall, gravity had a minimal effect on velar thickness, velar length, velar height, levator muscle length, angles of origin, and pharyngeal dimensions. Differences between the two body positions (upright and supine) were not significant during rest or during production of /i/ and /s/, with the exception of velar height during /i/ production.

Citing Articles

Measurement Matters: MRI Analysis of Differing Anatomic Measurement Techniques for Velar Length and the Velopharyngeal Needs Ratio.

Mason K, Hanson B, Black J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(2):e5617.

PMID: 38375369 PMC: 10876255. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005617.


Incorporating Velopharyngeal MRI into the Clinical Decision-Making Process for a Patient Presenting with Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Following a Failed Palatoplasty.

Mason K, Black J Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023; 61(9):1563-1573.

PMID: 37143294 PMC: 10624648. DOI: 10.1177/10556656231173500.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Velopharyngeal Function: Current Applications, Barriers, and Potential for Future Clinical Translation in the United States.

Mason K Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022; 61(2):235-246.

PMID: 36039513 PMC: 9971336. DOI: 10.1177/10556656221123916.


Identifying Predictors of Levator Veli Palatini Muscle Contraction During Speech Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Schleif E, Pelland C, Ellis C, Fang X, Leierer S, Sutton B J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(6):1726-1735.

PMID: 32539646 PMC: 7839028. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00013.


Asymmetry and Positioning of the Levator Veli Palatini Muscle in Children With Repaired Cleft Palate.

Kotlarek K, Pelland C, Blemker S, Jaskolka M, Fang X, Perry J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(5):1317-1325.

PMID: 32402223 PMC: 7842125. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00240.