Gender Differences in Health-related Quality-of-life Are Partly Explained by Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Variation Between Adult Men and Women in the US: Evidence from Four US Nationally Representative Data Sets

Overview

Journal Qual Life Res

Specialties Pharmacology
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2010 May 25

PMID 20496168

Citations 102

Authors

Dasha Cherepanov

Mari Palta

Dennis G Fryback

Stephanie A Robert

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe gender differences in self-reported health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and to examine whether differences are explained by sociodemographic and socioeconomic status (SES) differentials between men and women.

Methods: Data were from four US nationally representative surveys: US Valuation of the EuroQol EQ-5D Health States Survey (USVEQ), Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), National Health Measurement Study (NHMS) and Joint Canada/US Survey of Health (JCUSH). Gender differences were estimated with and without adjustment for sociodemographic and SES indicators using regression within and across data sets with SF-6D, EQ-5D, HUI2, HUI3 and QWB-SA scores as outcomes.

Results: Women have lower HRQoL scores than men on all indexes prior to adjustment. Adjusting for age, race, marital status, education and income reduced but did not remove the gender differences, except with HUI3. Adjusting for marital status or income had the largest impact on estimated gender differences.

Conclusions: There are clear gender differences in HRQoL in the United States. These differences are partly explained by sociodemographic and SES differentials.

Citing Articles

Gender-specific changes in vision-related quality of life over time - results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study.

Hartmann A, Grabitz S, Wild P, Lackner K, Munzel T, Kerahrodi J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025; .

PMID: 39934353 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-025-06741-9.

Exploring social determinants of health and their impacts on self-reported quality of life in long COVID-19 patients.

Pham A, Smith J, Card K, Byers K, Khor E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30410.

PMID: 39638836 PMC: 11621301. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81275-4.

Hegelund M, Jagerova L, Olsen M, Ryrso C, Ritz C, Matovu Dungu A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27315.

PMID: 39516517 PMC: 11549331. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74933-0.

A systematic review of quality of life (QoL) studies using the CASP scale in older adults.

Frias-Goytia G, Lojo-Seoane C, Mallo S, Nieto-Vieites A, Juncos-Rabadan O, Pereiro A Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(11):2915-2927.

PMID: 39110376 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03750-9.

Longitudinal Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients With High-Risk Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated on the Children's Oncology Group AHOD 1331 Study.

Williams A, Rodday A, Pei Q, Henderson T, Keller F, Punnett A J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(28):3330-3338.

PMID: 39058966 PMC: 11481752. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00038.

References

Torrance G, Feeny D, Furlong W, Barr R, Zhang Y, Wang Q . Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996; 34(7):702-22. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004. View

Hanmer J, Hays R, Fryback D . Mode of administration is important in US national estimates of health-related quality of life. Med Care. 2007; 45(12):1171-9. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181354828. View

Robert S, Cherepanov D, Palta M, Dunham N, Feeny D, Fryback D . Socioeconomic status and age variations in health-related quality of life: results from the national health measurement study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009; 64(3):378-89. PMC: 2670253. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbp012. View

Kochanek K, Murphy S, Anderson R, Scott C . Deaths: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2004; 53(5):1-115. View

Kaplan R, Anderson J . A general health policy model: update and applications. Health Serv Res. 1988; 23(2):203-35. PMC: 1065501. View

Sullivan P, Lawrence W, Ghushchyan V . A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care. 2005; 43(7):736-49. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000172050.67085.4f. View

Sanmartin C, Berthelot J, Ng E, Murphy K, Blackwell D, Gentleman J . Comparing health and health care use in Canada and the United States. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006; 25(4):1133-42. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.1133. View

Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M . The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002; 21(2):271-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8. View

Brazier J, Roberts J . The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004; 42(9):851-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000135827.18610.0d. View

10.

Hays R, Kim S, Spritzer K, Kaplan R, Tally S, Feeny D . Effects of mode and order of administration on generic health-related quality of life scores. Value Health. 2009; 12(6):1035-9. PMC: 2765402. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00566.x. View

11.

Liu H, Umberson D . The times they are a changin': marital status and health differentials from 1972 to 2003. J Health Soc Behav. 2008; 49(3):239-53. PMC: 3150568. DOI: 10.1177/002214650804900301. View

12.

Kaplan R . The minimally clinically important difference in generic utility-based measures. COPD. 2006; 2(1):91-7. DOI: 10.1081/copd-200052090. View

13.

Wyrwich K, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays R, Patrick D, Symonds T . Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(2):285-95. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2. View

14.

Courtenay W, McCreary D, Merighi J . Gender and ethnic differences in health beliefs and behaviors. J Health Psychol. 2011; 7(3):219-31. DOI: 10.1177/1359105302007003216. View

15.

Shaw J, Johnson J, Coons S . US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005; 43(3):203-20. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003. View

16.

Hanmer J, Lawrence W, Anderson J, Kaplan R, Fryback D . Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(4):391-400. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06290497. View

17.

Fryback D, Dunham N, Palta M, Hanmer J, Buechner J, Cherepanov D . US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study. Med Care. 2007; 45(12):1162-70. PMC: 2647803. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31814848f1. View

18.

Cohen J, Monheit A, Beauregard K, Cohen S, Lefkowitz D, Potter D . The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource. Inquiry. 1996; 33(4):373-89. View

19.

Fleishman J, Lawrence W . Demographic variation in SF-12 scores: true differences or differential item functioning?. Med Care. 2003; 41(7 Suppl):III75-III86. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000076052.42628.CF. View

20.

Shinberg D . For richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health: socioeconomic status and health among married couples. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000; 896:341-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08135.x. View