Analysis of DNA Repeats in Bacterial Plasmids Reveals the Potential for Recurrent Instability Events
Overview
Biotechnology
Microbiology
Affiliations
Structural instability has been frequently observed in natural plasmids and vectors used for protein expression or DNA vaccine development. However, there is a lack of information concerning hotspot mapping, namely, DNA repeats or sequences identical to the host genome. This led us to evaluate the abundance and distribution of direct, inverted, and tandem repeats with high recombination potential in 36 natural plasmids from ten bacterial genera, as well as in several widely used bacterial and mammalian expression vectors. In natural plasmids, we observed an overrepresentation of close direct repeats in comparison to inverted ones and a preferential location of repeats with high recombination potential in intergenic regions, suggesting a highly plastic and dynamic behavior. In plasmid vectors, we found a high density of repeats within eukaryotic promoters and non-coding sequences. As a result of this in silico analysis, we detected a spontaneous recombination between two 21-bp direct repeats present in the human cytomegalovirus early enhancer/promoter (huCMV EEP) of the pCIneo plasmid. This finding is of particular importance, as the huCMV EEP is one of the most frequently used regulatory elements in plasmid vectors. Because pDNA integration into host gDNA can have adverse consequences in terms of plasmid processing and host safety, we also mapped several regions with high probability to mediate integration into the Escherichia coli or human genomes. Like repeated regions, some of these were located in non-coding regions of the plasmids, thus being preferential targets to be removed.
Metagenomic assembly is the main bottleneck in the identification of mobile genetic elements.
Kerkvliet J, Bossers A, Kers J, Meneses R, Willems R, Schurch A PeerJ. 2024; 12:e16695.
PMID: 38188174 PMC: 10771768. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16695.
Rudenko O, Baseggio L, McGuigan F, Barnes A Microbiologyopen. 2023; 12(4):e1374.
PMID: 37642481 PMC: 10441182. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1374.
Mitochondrial genome engineering coming-of-age.
Barrera-Paez J, Moraes C Trends Genet. 2022; 38(8):869-880.
PMID: 35599021 PMC: 9283244. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.04.011.
Basu D, South P Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:828729.
PMID: 35251099 PMC: 8888687. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.828729.
CRISPR-Cas systems are widespread accessory elements across bacterial and archaeal plasmids.
Pinilla-Redondo R, Russel J, Mayo-Munoz D, Shah S, Garrett R, Nesme J Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 50(8):4315-4328.
PMID: 34606604 PMC: 9071438. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab859.