» Articles » PMID: 20493349

Cochlear Implantation in Adolescents with Prelinguistic Deafness

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2010 May 25
PMID 20493349
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were to examine auditory function in a group of adolescents with prelingual deafness who received cochlear implants (CI) and to identify poor-outcome predictors in order to define reliable prognostic indicators useful in selecting patients for CI.

Study Design: Prospective study.

Setting: The study was conducted in the Audiology Unit of Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Subjects And Methods: The study involved 45 adolescents (mean age at implantation: 13.4 +/- 2.6 years, range: 11-18) with profound congenital hearing impairment with a follow-up of three years. Preimplantation and postimplantation auditory performance and speech perception were evaluated using the mean score of three hearing and speech perception tests (vowel-consonant-vowel [VCV], identification of disyllabic words, and recognition of short sentences) performed in auditory-only listening conditions.

Results: Significant improvements in all speech perception tests were observed after CI. However, 15 cases were considered "poor performers" (i.e., the auditory performance of these patients was less than 30 percent). The diagnosis of deafness in these subjects was significantly delayed (18.07 +/- 6.25 and 34.4 +/- 10.26 months in good and poor performers, respectively, P = 0.006), and their hearing threshold was significantly lower than in the good users group. The mean age at CI was 12.8 +/- 2.33 and 14.53 +/- 2.70 years in good and poor performers, respectively (P = ns).

Conclusion: CI was shown to be a useful device with the ability to reverse the adverse consequences of hearing loss, particularly for prelingual adolescents who receive implantation early in life and who present a hearing threshold of 100 dB or better both at diagnosis and at surgery.

Citing Articles

Speech recognition and quality of life outcomes of adults with cochlear implants following a quarter-century of deafness: what should be the maximum duration?.

Ozkan Atak H, Sennaroglu G, Sennaroglu L Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 280(11):4903-4913.

PMID: 37672104 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08214-3.


Long Term Impact of Age at Implantation on Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipient Children.

Gaurav V, Mishra A, Karmani S Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 75(Suppl 1):103-111.

PMID: 37206782 PMC: 10188752. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-022-03260-5.


The Effect of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Speech and Auditory Performances in Prelingually Deaf Children.

Shakrawal N, Sonkhya N, Agarwal S, Grover M Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022; 74(Suppl 1):52-61.

PMID: 36032837 PMC: 9411477. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01821-0.


Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation in Prelingual Profoundly Deaf Adult Patients.

Lahlou G, Daoudi H, Ferrary E, Jia H, De Bergh M, Nguyen Y J Clin Med. 2022; 11(7).

PMID: 35407482 PMC: 8999851. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071874.


Effects of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Auditory Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipient Children.

Gaurav V, Sharma S, Singh S Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 72(1):79-85.

PMID: 32158661 PMC: 7040147. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01753-4.