» Articles » PMID: 20492845

Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients with Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: Relationship to Treatment Response and Symptom Relapse

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2010 May 25
PMID 20492845
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Data were analyzed from 2 prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of escitalopram in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) to characterize the baseline levels of functional disability and impairment in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to assess the relationship between treatment outcomes (response or relapse) and disability or HRQoL.

Method: Data from a 24-week, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial (N = 466) of escitalopram (10-20 mg/d) or paroxetine (40 mg/d) and from a 40-week, flexible-dose (escitalopram 10-20 mg/d), placebo-controlled relapse-prevention trial (N = 468) were analyzed. Obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms (DSM-IV criteria) were assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), functioning was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and HRQoL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36). Baseline data were pooled for patients across both studies. For patients in the fixed-dose study, SDS and SF-36 scores were compared across treatment groups and for responders versus nonresponders. In the relapse-prevention trial, SDS and SF-36 scores were compared for relapsed versus nonrelapsed patients.

Results: Patients with more severe baseline symptoms (YBOCS > or = 27) reported significantly greater impairment on the SDS (P < .001) and SF-36 (except for bodily pain). Patients receiving escitalopram or paroxetine reported significant improvements on most SF-36 dimensions and on the SDS compared to placebo; however, improvements in work-related functioning were seen earlier for patients receiving escitalopram (20 mg/d). At the study endpoints, SDS and SF-36 scores were significantly better for patients who were responders (versus nonresponders) and for patients who did not relapse (versus relapsers).

Conclusions: Obsessive-compulsive disorder is associated with significant impairment in functioning and HRQoL. Significant differences in disability and HRQoL between responders and nonresponders or relapsers and nonrelapsers suggest a relationship between symptomatic and functional outcomes.

Trial Registration: lundbecktrials.com Identifiers: 10205 and 10193.

Citing Articles

Altered dynamic neural activities in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder and comorbid depressive symptoms.

Shang T, Chen Y, Ding Z, Qin W, Li S, Wei S Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1403933.

PMID: 39176228 PMC: 11339690. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1403933.


Things that make you go Hmm: Myths and misconceptions within cognitive-behavioral treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Spencer S, Stiede J, Wiese A, Guzick A, Cervin M, McKay D J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2023; 37.

PMID: 37193037 PMC: 10168610. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100805.


Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Spencer S, Stiede J, Wiese A, Goodman W, Guzick A, Storch E Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2023; 46(1):167-180.

PMID: 36740350 PMC: 11170287. DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2022.10.004.


Shape analysis of subcortical structures in obsessive-compulsive disorder and the relationship with comorbid anxiety, depression, and medication use: A meta-analysis by the OCD Brain Imaging Consortium.

Fouche J, Groenewold N, Sevenoaks T, Heany S, Lochner C, Alonso P Brain Behav. 2022; 12(10):e2755.

PMID: 36106505 PMC: 9575597. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2755.


First vs second wave of COVID-19 pandemic in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder: A multicentre report from tertiary clinics in Northern Italy.

Benatti B, Albert U, Maina G, Celebre L, Girone N, Bramante S J Psychiatr Res. 2022; 154:293-299.

PMID: 35964348 PMC: 9353706. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.058.