» Articles » PMID: 20485554

Systematic Comparison of Constitutive Promoters and the Doxycycline-inducible Promoter

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2010 May 21
PMID 20485554
Citations 252
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Constitutive promoters are used routinely to drive ectopic gene expression. Here, we carried out a systematic comparison of eight commonly used constitutive promoters (SV40, CMV, UBC, EF1A, PGK and CAGG for mammalian systems, and COPIA and ACT5C for Drosophila systems). We also included in the comparison the TRE promoter, which can be activated by the rtTA transcriptional activator in a doxycycline-inducible manner. To make our findings representative, we conducted the comparison in a variety of cell types derived from several species. We found that these promoters vary considerably from one another in their strength. Most promoters have fairly consistent strengths across different cell types, but the CMV promoter can vary considerably from cell type to cell type. At maximal induction, the TRE promoter is comparable to a strong constitutive promoter. These results should facilitate more rational choices of promoters in ectopic gene expression studies.

Citing Articles

The landscape of cell lineage tracing.

Feng Y, Liu G, Li H, Cheng L Sci China Life Sci. 2025; .

PMID: 40035969 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-024-2751-6.


Application of Pseudoinfectious Viruses in Transient Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells: Combining Efficient Expression with Regulatory Compliance.

Zauatbayeva G, Kulatay T, Ingirbay B, Shakhmanova Z, Keyer V, Zaripov M Biomolecules. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001577 PMC: 11852456. DOI: 10.3390/biom15020274.


Regulatory Elements for Gene Therapy of Epilepsy.

Chesnokova E, Bal N, Alhalabi G, Balaban P Cells. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39937026 PMC: 11816724. DOI: 10.3390/cells14030236.


Enhanced detection of circulating tumor cells using a MUC1 promoter-driven recombinant adenovirus.

Wang C, Gu H, Cai J, Zhu C, Zheng Q, Xu H Front Oncol. 2025; 14:1506968.

PMID: 39886667 PMC: 11779711. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1506968.


A modular toolbox for the optogenetic deactivation of transcription.

Muench P, Fiumara M, Southern N, Coda D, Aschenbrenner S, Correia B Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 53(3).

PMID: 39676667 PMC: 11797043. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1237.


References
1.
Baum B, Cherbas L . Drosophila cell lines as model systems and as an experimental tool. Methods Mol Biol. 2008; 420:391-424. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-583-1_25. View

2.
Lois C, Hong E, Pease S, Brown E, Baltimore D . Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science. 2002; 295(5556):868-72. DOI: 10.1126/science.1067081. View

3.
Yanagawa S, Lee J, Ishimoto A . Identification and characterization of a novel line of Drosophila Schneider S2 cells that respond to wingless signaling. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273(48):32353-9. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.48.32353. View

4.
Manthorpe M, Hartikka J, Felgner J, Rundell A, Margalith M, Dwarki V . Gene therapy by intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA: studies on firefly luciferase gene expression in mice. Hum Gene Ther. 1993; 4(4):419-31. DOI: 10.1089/hum.1993.4.4-419. View

5.
Rebay I, Fleming R, Fehon R, Cherbas L, Cherbas P, Artavanis-Tsakonas S . Specific EGF repeats of Notch mediate interactions with Delta and Serrate: implications for Notch as a multifunctional receptor. Cell. 1991; 67(4):687-99. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90064-6. View