» Articles » PMID: 20484640

Information About the Weight of Grasped Objects from Vision and Internal Models Interacts Within the Primary Motor Cortex

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2010 May 21
PMID 20484640
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When grasping and lifting different objects, visual cues and previously acquired knowledge enable us to prepare the upcoming grasp by scaling the fingertip forces according to the actual weight of the object. However, when no visual information is available, the weight of the object has to be predicted based on information learned from previous grasps. Here, we investigated how changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) and grip force scaling depend on the presence of visual cues and the weight of previously lifted objects. CSE was assessed by delivering transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at different times before grasp of the object. In conditions in which visual information was not provided, the size of motor evoked potentials (MEP) was larger when the object lifted was preceded by a heavy relative to a light object. Interestingly, the previous lift also affected MEP amplitude when visual cues about object weight were available but only in the period immediately after object presentation (50 ms); this effect had already declined for TMS delivered 150 ms after presentation. In a second experiment, we demonstrated that these CSE changes are used by the motor system to scale grip force. This suggests that the corticospinal system stores a "sensorimotor memory" of the grasp of different objects and relies on this memory when no visual cues are present. Moreover, visual information about weight interacts with this stored representation and allows the corticospinal system to switch rapidly to a different model of predictive grasp control.

Citing Articles

Investigating how prior knowledge influences perception and action in developmental coordination disorder.

Allen K, Harris D, Arthur T, Wood G, Buckingham G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023; 77(10):2065-2075.

PMID: 37926854 PMC: 11487901. DOI: 10.1177/17470218231214479.


Manipulation Tasks in Hazardous Environments Using a Teleoperated Robot: A Case Study at CERN.

Gentile C, Lunghi G, Buonocore L, Cordella F, Di Castro M, Masi A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(4).

PMID: 36850591 PMC: 9963582. DOI: 10.3390/s23041979.


Transfer of weight information depends differently on used hand and handedness for perception and action.

van Polanen V PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0278133.

PMID: 36512574 PMC: 9746940. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278133.


Multisensory information about changing object properties can be used to quickly correct predictive force scaling for object lifting.

van Polanen V Exp Brain Res. 2022; 240(7-8):2121-2133.

PMID: 35786747 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06404-9.


Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper.

Siebner H, Funke K, Aberra A, Antal A, Bestmann S, Chen R Clin Neurophysiol. 2022; 140:59-97.

PMID: 35738037 PMC: 9753778. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022.


References
1.
Jenmalm P, Schmitz C, Forssberg H, Ehrsson H . Lighter or heavier than predicted: neural correlates of corrective mechanisms during erroneously programmed lifts. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(35):9015-21. PMC: 6675347. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5045-05.2006. View

2.
Schmitz C, Jenmalm P, Ehrsson H, Forssberg H . Brain activity during predictable and unpredictable weight changes when lifting objects. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 93(3):1498-509. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00230.2004. View

3.
Jenmalm P, Johansson R . Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces. J Neurosci. 1997; 17(11):4486-99. PMC: 6573538. View

4.
Witney A, Goodbody S, Wolpert D . Learning and decay of prediction in object manipulation. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 84(1):334-43. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.334. View

5.
Terao Y, Fukuda H, Ugawa Y, Hikosaka O, Hanajima R, Furubayashi T . Visualization of the information flow through human oculomotor cortical regions by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 1998; 80(2):936-46. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.2.936. View