» Articles » PMID: 20484089

Effect of Adding a Values Clarification Exercise to a Decision Aid on Heart Disease Prevention: a Randomized Trial

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2010 May 21
PMID 20484089
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Experts have called for the inclusion of values clarification (VC) exercises in decision aids (DAs) as a means of improving their effectiveness, but little research has examined the effects of such exercises.

Objective: To determine whether adding a VC exercise to a DA on heart disease prevention improves decision-making outcomes.

Design: Randomized trial.

Setting: UNC Decision Support Laboratory.

Patients: Adults ages 40 to 80 with no history of cardiovascular disease.

Intervention: A Web-based heart disease prevention DA with or without a VC exercise.

Measurements: Pre- and postintervention decisional conflict and intent to reduce coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and postintervention self-efficacy and perceived values concordance.

Results: The authors enrolled 137 participants (62 in DA; 75 in DA + VC with moderate decisional conflict (DA 2.4; DA + VC 2.5) and no baseline differences among groups. After the interventions, they found no clinically or statistically significant differences between groups in decisional conflict (DA 1.8; DA + VC 1.9; absolute difference VC-DA 0.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.1 to 0.3), intent to reduce CHD risk (DA 98%; DA + VC 100%; absolute difference VC-DA: 2%, 95% CI: -0.02% to 5%), perceived values concordance (DA 95%; DA + VC 92%; absolute difference VC-DA -3%, 95% CI: -11% to +5%), or self-efficacy for risk reduction (DA 97%; DA + VC 92%; absolute difference VC-DA -5%, 95% CI: -13% to +3%). However, DA + VC tended to change some decisions about risk reduction strategies.

Limitations: Use of a hypothetical scenario; ceiling effects for some outcomes.

Conclusions: Adding a VC intervention to a DA did not further improve decision-making outcomes in a population of highly educated and motivated adults responding to scenario-based questions. Work is needed to determine the effects of VC on more diverse populations and more distal outcomes.

Citing Articles

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Stacey D, Lewis K, Smith M, Carley M, Volk R, Douglas E Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 1:CD001431.

PMID: 38284415 PMC: 10823577. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6.


Effects of an Explicit Value Clarification Method With Computer-Tailored Advice on the Effectiveness of a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Decision Aid: Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gultzow T, Smit E, Crutzen R, Jolani S, Hoving C, Dirksen C J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(7):e34246.

PMID: 35838773 PMC: 9338418. DOI: 10.2196/34246.


Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Witteman H, Ndjaboue R, Vaisson G, Chipenda Dansokho S, Arnold B, Bridges J Med Decis Making. 2021; 41(7):801-820.

PMID: 34565196 PMC: 8482297. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X211037946.


An Autonomy-Supportive Online Decision Aid to Assist Smokers in Choosing Evidence-Based Cessation Assistance: Development Process and Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gultzow T, Smit E, Hudales R, Knapen V, Rademakers J, Dirksen C JMIR Res Protoc. 2020; 9(12):e21772.

PMID: 33320096 PMC: 7772073. DOI: 10.2196/21772.


Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment in a Decision Aid to Nudge Patients Towards Value-Concordant Treatment Choices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Hazlewood G, Marshall D, Barber C, Li L, Barnabe C, Bykerk V Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020; 14:829-838.

PMID: 32546977 PMC: 7244245. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S221897.


References
1.
OConnor A, Stacey D, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, ROVNER D, Holmes-Rovner M . Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (2):CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431. View

2.
Elwyn G, OConnor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A . Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006; 333(7565):417. PMC: 1553508. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. View

3.
Dodin S, Legare F, Daudelin G, Tetroe J, OConnor A . [Making a decision about hormone replacement therapy. A randomized controlled trial]. Can Fam Physician. 2001; 47:1586-93. PMC: 2018543. View

4.
Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, ROVNER D, Schmitt N, Rothert M, Padonu G . Patient decision support intervention: increased consistency with decision analytic models. Med Care. 1999; 37(3):270-84. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199903000-00007. View

5.
OConnor A, Legare F, Stacey D . Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ. 2003; 327(7417):736-40. PMC: 200814. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.736. View