» Articles » PMID: 20479910

Learning Curves for Colonoscopy: a Prospective Evaluation of Gastroenterology Fellows at a Single Center

Abstract

Background/aims: Colonoscopy training programs and the minimal experience with colonoscopy required to be considered technically competent are not well established. The aim of this study was to determine the colonoscopy learning curves and factors associated with this difficult procedure at a single center.

Methods: A total of 3,243 colonoscopies were performed by 12 first-year gastroenterology fellows, and various clinical factors were assessed prospectively for 22 months. Acquisition of competence (success rate) was evaluated based on two objective criteria: (i) the adjusted completion rate (>90%) and (ii) cecal intubation time (<20 minutes).

Results: The overall success rate in reaching the cecum in less than 20 minutes was 72.8%. The cecal intubation time was 9.34+/-4.13 minutes (mean+/-SD). Trainees' skill at performing cecal intubation in <20 minutes reached the requisite standard of competence after 200 procedures. Cecal intubation time decreased significantly from 11.3 to 9.4 minutes after 100 procedures and improved continuously thereafter. Female patients and advanced patient age (over 60 years) were associated with prolonged cecal intubation time (>20 minutes). Surgery of the uterus and ovaries was significantly correlated with delayed cecal intubation time, but not after sufficient colonoscopy experience.

Conclusions: The minimum number of procedures to reach technical competence was 200. The cecal intubation time was longer in female and older patients.

Citing Articles

Prospective assessment of learning curve and impact of intensive versus progressive training in colonoscopy competence among French residents.

Wintzer-Wehekind L, Moulis L, Camus M, Vanbiervliet G, Benamouzig R, Duflos C BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):367.

PMID: 40069701 PMC: 11899161. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06924-2.


Can my surgeon scope? Trends in endoscopy training volume and experience among general surgery residents in the United States: a nationwide analysis.

Sohail A, Martinez C, Martinez K, Nguyen H, Flesner S, Khan A Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(3):1491-1498.

PMID: 38242988 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10690-5.


Sex Difference of Colon Adenoma Pathway and Colorectal Carcinogenesis.

Choi Y, Kim N World J Mens Health. 2023; 42(2):256-282.

PMID: 37652658 PMC: 10949019. DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230085.


The imitation game: a review of the use of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy, and endoscopists' perceptions thereof.

Tham S, Koh F, Ladlad J, Chue K, Lin C, Teo E Ann Coloproctol. 2023; 39(5):385-394.

PMID: 36907170 PMC: 10626328. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2022.00878.0125.


Automatic anatomical classification of colonoscopic images using deep convolutional neural networks.

Saito H, Tanimoto T, Ozawa T, Ishihara S, Fujishiro M, Shichijo S Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2021; 9(3):226-233.

PMID: 34316372 PMC: 8309686. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goaa078.


References
1.
Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, Barcherini S, Crespi M . Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut. 2001; 48(6):812-5. PMC: 1728339. DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.6.812. View

2.
Shah H, Paszat L, Saskin R, Stukel T, Rabeneck L . Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007; 132(7):2297-303. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.032. View

3.
Lee S, Chung I, Kim S, Kim J, Ko B, Hwangbo Y . An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67(4):683-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.018. View

4.
Marshall J, Barthel J . The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993; 39(4):518-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70162-5. View

5.
Bair D, Pham J, Seaton M, Arya N, Pryce M, Seaton T . The quality of screening colonoscopies in an office-based endoscopy clinic. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009; 23(1):41-7. PMC: 2695147. DOI: 10.1155/2009/831029. View