» Articles » PMID: 20473927

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies of Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Colorectal, Breast and Prostate Cancer and Colorectal Adenoma

Overview
Journal Int J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2010 May 18
PMID 20473927
Citations 204
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Epidemiological studies have suggested a reduced risk of several cancers associated with high vitamin D status. We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses of observational studies of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and colorectal, breast and prostate cancer and colonic adenoma. The literature of December 2009 was searched without language restriction. The meta-regression analysis was done to compute dose-response effects. Because in case-control studies, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level is measured after the diagnosis of cancer, separate analyses for case-control and prospective studies were done. We identified 35 independent studies. The seven studies on colorectal adenomas were heterogeneous in terms of endpoint and control for major confounding factors, and we did not perform a meta-analysis of these data. The summary relative risk (SRR) and (95% confidence interval) for a 10 ng/ml increase in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was 0.85 (0.79; 0.91) for colorectal cancer (2,630 cases in 9 studies); 0.89 (0.81;0.98) for breast cancer (6,175 cases in 10 studies); and 0.99 (0.95;1.03) for prostate cancer (3,956 cases in 11 studies). For breast cancer, case-control studies (3,030 cases) had major limitations and obtained SRR of 0.83 (0.79; 0.87) whereas SRR of prospective studies (3,145 cases) was 0.97 (0.92; 1.03). For colorectal and breast cancer, differences between cases and controls in the season of blood draw or in overweight/obesity or physical inactivity could not explain the results. In conclusion, a consistent inverse relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and colorectal cancer was found. No association was found for breast and prostate cancer.

Citing Articles

Enhancing the prediction of vitamin D deficiency levels using an integrated approach of deep learning and evolutionary computing.

Alzahrani A, Asghar M PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025; 11:e2698.

PMID: 40062307 PMC: 11888904. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2698.


A Randomized Phase II/III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of 100 and 125 µg of Calcifediol Weekly Treatment of Severe Vitamin D Deficiency.

Perez-Castrillon J, Jodar-Gimeno E, Nociar J, Lojka M, Nikolov D, Cereto-Castro F Nutrients. 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40005002 PMC: 11857939. DOI: 10.3390/nu17040672.


PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade in breast cancer: research insights and sensitization strategies.

Jin M, Fang J, Peng J, Wang X, Xing P, Jia K Mol Cancer. 2024; 23(1):266.

PMID: 39614285 PMC: 11605969. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-024-02176-8.


A real-world study of active vitamin D as a prognostic marker in patients with sarcoma.

Zhang L, Li W, Wang X, Yu S, Zhuang R, Zhou Y Discov Oncol. 2024; 15(1):384.

PMID: 39207640 PMC: 11362410. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01152-4.


Umbrella Review on the Relationship between Vitamin D Levels and Cancer.

Schomann-Finck M, Reichrath J Nutrients. 2024; 16(16).

PMID: 39203855 PMC: 11356988. DOI: 10.3390/nu16162720.