» Articles » PMID: 20473756

The Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab for the Treatment of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Rheumatol Int
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2010 May 18
PMID 20473756
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The authors surveyed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of rituximab in disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) (including methotrexate [MTX]) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocker-resistant or intolerant patients with active RA using Medline, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and manual searches. Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed to determine the treatment efficacy and safety outcomes of rituximab (1 course, consisting of two infusions of 1,000 mg each) concomitant with MTX. The three RCTs included 938 DMARD or TNF-blocker-resistant or intolerant RA patients. Follow-up periods ranged from 24 to 48 weeks. American College of Rheumatology response (ACR) 20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates were significantly higher for the rituximab plus MTX than for placebo controls (primary efficacy outcome, ACR50; risk ratio [RR] 3.648, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.478-5.369, P < 0.001). For those treated with rituximab, the incidence adverse events of all systems were not higher than in those treated with placebo (RR 1.062, 95% CI 0.912-1.236, P = 0.438). With respect to the number of patients that experienced at least one serious adverse event, no significant difference was observed between patients treated with rituximab and placebo (RR 0.855, 95% CI 0.622-1.174, P = 0.333). A single course of rituximab with concomitant MTX therapy was found to be effective in DMARD or TNF-blocker-resistant or intolerant patients with active RA.

Citing Articles

A subset of type-II collagen-binding antibodies prevents experimental arthritis by inhibiting FCGR3 signaling in neutrophils.

Xu Z, Xu B, Lundstrom S, Moreno-Giro A, Zhao D, Martin M Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):5949.

PMID: 37741824 PMC: 10517938. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41561-7.


Comparison of the efficacy and safety of olokizumab at different dosages in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Lee Y, Song G Z Rheumatol. 2023; 83(Suppl 1):107-114.

PMID: 37266677 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-023-01367-w.


Association between functional FCGR3A F158V and FCGR2A R131H polymorphisms and responsiveness to rituximab in patients with autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis.

Lee Y, Song G Pharmacogenomics J. 2023; 23(6):210-216.

PMID: 37149714 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-023-00308-9.


Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and olokizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Lee Y, Song G Z Rheumatol. 2023; 83(Suppl 1):97-106.

PMID: 36607422 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-022-01315-0.


Real world safety of CT-P10 (anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies biosimilar) in rheumatic and autoimmune diseases.

Katchamart W, Ngamjanyaporn P, Orawongpaisarn A, Phubangkertphon T, Borrirukwisitsak S, Dechapaphapitak N BMC Rheumatol. 2022; 6(1):77.

PMID: 36447248 PMC: 9710159. DOI: 10.1186/s41927-022-00306-7.


References
1.
Felson D, Anderson J, Boers M, Bombardier C, Furst D, Goldsmith C . American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1995; 38(6):727-35. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780380602. View

2.
Sibilia J, Gottenberg J, Mariette X . Rituximab: a new therapeutic alternative in rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2008; 75(5):526-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.02.009. View

3.
Keystone E, Burmester G, Furie R, Loveless J, Emery P, Kremer J . Improvement in patient-reported outcomes in a rituximab trial in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(6):785-93. DOI: 10.1002/art.23715. View

4.
Jadad A, Moore R, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds D, Gavaghan D . Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4. View

5.
Davey Smith G, Egger M . Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 1997; 350(9085):1182. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63833-0. View