» Articles » PMID: 20471292

Comparison of Neonatal MRI Examinations with and Without an MR-compatible Incubator: Advantages in Examination Feasibility and Clinical Decision-making

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2010 May 18
PMID 20471292
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the utility of an MRI-compatible incubator (INC) by comparing.

Methods: In a retrospective study, the clinical and radiological aspects of 129 neonatal MRI examinations during a 3 year period were analyzed. Routine protocols including fast spin-echo T2-weighted (w) sequences, axial T1w, Gradient-echo, diffusion sequences, and 3D T1 gradient-echo sequences were performed routinely, angiography and spectroscopy were added in some cases. Diffusion-tensor imaging was done in 50% of the babies examined in the INC and 26% without INC. Sequences, adapted from fetal MR-protocols were done in infants younger than 32 gestational weeks. Benefit from MR-information with respect to further management was evaluated.

Results: The number of the examinations increased (30-99), while the mean age (43-38, 8 weeks of gestational age) and weight (3308-2766 g) decreased significantly with the use of the MR-compatible incubator. The mean imaging time (34, 43-30, 29 min) decreased, with a mean of one additionally performed sequence in the INC group. All infants received sedatives according to our anaesthetic protocol preceding imaging, but a repeated dose was never necessary (10% without INC) using the INC. Regarding all cases, MR-based changes in clinical management were initiated in 58%, while in 57% of cases the initial ultrasound diagnosis was changed or further specified.

Conclusions: The use of the INC enables the MR access of unstable infants with suspect CNS problems to the management, of whom is improved by MR information to significantly higher percentage, than without INC.

Citing Articles

A 1-Tesla MRI system for dedicated brain imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Berson E, Mozayan A, Peterec S, Taylor S, Bamford N, Ment L Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1132173.

PMID: 36845429 PMC: 9951115. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1132173.


Magnetic resonance imaging in neonates: a practical approach to optimize image quality and increase diagnostic yield.

Handa A, Xu L, Machado-Rivas F, Cortes-Albornoz M, Ruggiero M, Bedoya M Pediatr Radiol. 2022; 53(7):1300-1313.

PMID: 36471168 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05550-0.


Clinical experience with an in-NICU magnetic resonance imaging system.

Thiim K, Singh E, Mukundan S, Grant P, Yang E, El-Dib M J Perinatol. 2022; 42(7):873-879.

PMID: 35459908 PMC: 9026005. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-022-01387-5.


An ode to fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging: Chronicling early clinical to research applications with MRI, and an introduction to an academic society connecting the field.

Pollatou A, Filippi C, Aydin E, Vaughn K, Thompson D, Korom M Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022; 54:101083.

PMID: 35184026 PMC: 8861425. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101083.


Expert consensus on the clinical practice of neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2022; 24(1):14-25.

PMID: 35177171 PMC: 8802390. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2110018.