Reasoning in the Capacity to Make Medical Decisions: the Consideration of Values

Overview

Journal J Clin Ethics

Publisher University of Chicago Press

Specialty Medical Ethics

Date 2010 May 15

PMID 20465077

Citations 19

Authors

Michele J Karel

Ronald J Gurrera

Bret Hicken

Jennifer Moye

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the contribution of "values-based reasoning" in evaluating older adults' capacity to make medical decisions.

Design And Methods: Older men with schizophrenia (n=20) or dementia (n=20), and a primary care comparison group (n=19), completed cognitive and psychiatric screening and an interview to determine their capacity to make medical decisions, which included a component on values. All of the participants were receiving treatment at Veterans Administration (VA) outpatient clinics.

Results: Participants varied widely in the activities and relationships they most valued, the extent to which religious beliefs would influence healthcare decisions, and in ratings of the importance of preserving quality versus length of life. Most participants preferred shared decision making with doctor, family, or both. Individuals with schizophrenia or dementia performed worse than a primary care comparison group in reasoning measured by the ability to list risks and benefits and compare choices. Individuals with dementia performed comparably to the primary care group in reasoning measured by the ability to justify choices in terms of valued abilities or activities, whereas individuals with schizophrenia performed relatively worse compared to the other two groups. Compared to primary care patients, participants with schizophrenia and with dementia were impaired on the ability to explain treatment choices in terms of valued relationships.

Conclusion: Medical decision making may be influenced by strongly held values and beliefs, emotions, and long life experience. To date, these issues have not been explicitly included in structured evaluations of medical decision-making capacity. This study demonstrated that it is possible to inquire of and elicit a range of healthcare related values and preferences from older adults with dementia or schizophrenia, and individuals with mild to moderate dementia may be able to discuss healthcare options in relation to their values. However, how best to incorporate a values assessment into a structured capacity evaluation deserves further research attention.

Citing Articles

Facing the new diagnostic and treatment options of Alzheimer's disease: The necessity of informed consent.

Karneboge J, Haberstroh J, Geschke K, Perry J, Radenbach K, Jessen F Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 21(1):e14204.

PMID: 39740107 PMC: 11772727. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14204.

The impact of perceived crisis severity on intention to use voluntary proximity tracing applications.

Trkman M, Popovic A, Trkman P Int J Inf Manage. 2022; 61:102395.

PMID: 36540293 PMC: 9756014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102395.

Healthcare decision-making capacity in old age: A qualitative study.

Amaral A, Simoes M, Freitas S, Vilar M, Sousa L, Afonso R Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1024967.

PMID: 36353088 PMC: 9638398. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024967.

An insight into patients' perspectives on barriers affecting participation in shared decision making among patients with diabetes mellitus in Malawi.

Makwero M, Muula A, Anyanwu F, Igumbor J BMC Prim Care. 2022; 23(1):42.

PMID: 35272620 PMC: 8915511. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01635-9.

Who gets to decide for the older patient with a limited decision-making capacity: a review of surrogacy laws in the European Union.

Tibullo L, Esquinas A, Vargas M, Fabbo A, Micillo F, Parisi A Eur Geriatr Med. 2021; 9(6):759-769.

PMID: 34674481 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-018-0121-8.

References

Sweeney K . Crisis decision theory: decisions in the face of negative events. Psychol Bull. 2008; 134(1):61-76. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.61. View

Appelbaum P . Ought we to require emotional capacity as part of decisional competence?. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2001; 8(4):377-87. DOI: 10.1353/ken.1998.0024. View

Evans J . Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007; 59:255-78. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629. View

Lawton M, Moss M, Hoffman C, Grant R, ten HAVE T, KLEBAN M . Health, valuation of life, and the wish to live. Gerontologist. 1999; 39(4):406-16. DOI: 10.1093/geront/39.4.406. View

Dijksterhuis A, Bos M, Nordgren L, van Baaren R . On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect. Science. 2006; 311(5763):1005-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1121629. View

Blackhall L, Murphy S, FRANK G, Michel V, Azen S . Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA. 1995; 274(10):820-5. View

Kluge E . Competence, capacity, and informed consent: beyond the cognitive-competence model. Can J Aging. 2006; 24(3):295-304. DOI: 10.1353/cja.2005.0077. View

Moye J, Azar A, Karel M, Gurrera R . Hopes and Cautions for Instrument-Based Evaluation of Consent Capacity: Results of a Construct Validity Study of Three Instruments. Ethics Law Aging Rev. 2016; 10. PMC: 4908454. View

Fischer G, ALPERT H, STOECKLE J, Emanuel L . Can goals of care be used to predict intervention preferences in an advance directive?. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157(7):801-7. View

10.

Kwak J, Haley W . Current research findings on end-of-life decision making among racially or ethnically diverse groups. Gerontologist. 2005; 45(5):634-41. DOI: 10.1093/geront/45.5.634. View

11.

Cohen-Mansfield J, Droge J, Billig N . Factors influencing hospital patients' preferences in the utilization of life-sustaining treatments. Gerontologist. 1992; 32(1):89-95. DOI: 10.1093/geront/32.1.89. View

12.

McPherson C, Wilson K, Murray M . Feeling like a burden to others: a systematic review focusing on the end of life. Palliat Med. 2007; 21(2):115-28. DOI: 10.1177/0269216307076345. View

13.

Marson D, Schmitt F, Ingram K, Harrell L . Determining the competency of Alzheimer patients to consent to treatment and research. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994; 8 Suppl 4:5-18. View

14.

Degenholtz H, Kane R, Kivnick H . Care-related preferences and values of elderly community-based LTC consumers: can case managers learn what's important to clients?. Gerontologist. 1998; 37(6):767-76. DOI: 10.1093/geront/37.6.767. View

15.

Kim S, Karlawish J, Caine E . Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002; 10(2):151-65. View

16.

Marson D, McInturff B, Hawkins L, Bartolucci A, Harrell L . Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45(4):453-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05170.x. View

17.

Schonwetter R, Walker R, Solomon M, Indurkhya A, Robinson B . Life values, resuscitation preferences, and the applicability of living wills in an older population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996; 44(8):954-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01867.x. View

18.

Karel M, Moye J, Bank A, Azar A . Three methods of assessing values for advance care planning: comparing persons with and without dementia. J Aging Health. 2007; 19(1):123-51. PMC: 4859331. DOI: 10.1177/0898264306296394. View

19.

Degenholtz H, Thomas S, Miller M . Race and the intensive care unit: disparities and preferences for end-of-life care. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31(5 Suppl):S373-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065121.62144.0D. View

20.

Degner L, Sloan J . Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45(9):941-50. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9. View