» Articles » PMID: 20461223

Unicompartmental Knee Resurfacing: Enlarged Tibio-femoral Contact Area and Reduced Contact Stress Using Novel Patient-derived Geometries

Overview
Publisher Bentham Open
Date 2010 May 13
PMID 20461223
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Advances in imaging technology and computer-assisted design (CAD) have recently enabled the introduction of patient-specific knee implant designs that hold the potential to improve functional performance on the basis of patient-specific geometries, namely a patient-specific sagittal and coronal curvature, as well as enhanced bone preservation. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of a novel implant design utilizing a patient specific sagittal J-curve on the femoral component combined with a novel constant, patient-derived femoral coronal curvature and to assess tibio-femoral contact area and contact stress on a femur matched curved tibial polyethylene insert. Mean contact area and standard deviations were 81+/-5, 96+/-5 and 74+/-4 mm(2) for the heel strike, toe off and mid-stance positions, respectively. Mean contact stress and standard deviations were 23.83+/-1.39, 23.27+/-1.14 and 20.78+/-0.54 MPa for the heel strike, toe off and mid-stance positions, respectively. Standard deviations of the measurements were small, not exceeding 6-7% confirming the consistency of loading conditions across different flexion angles. The results were comparable to those reported for standard, off-the-shelf fixed-bearing implants with paired femoral and tibial geometries. These data show that a constant coronal curvature can be applied to a patient-specific implant by measuring coronal curvatures across the femoral condyle in each patient and by deriving an average curvature. This novel approach combines unique benefits of patient-specific geometry with proven design concepts for minimizing polyethylene wear.

Citing Articles

Insufficient evidence to confirm benefits of custom partial knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Demey G, Muller J, Liebensteiner M, Pilot P, Nover L, Kort N Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 30(12):3968-3982.

PMID: 34792611 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06766-7.


Restoration of normal knee kinematics with respect to tibial insert design in mobile bearing lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty using computational simulation.

Koh Y, Lee J, Chung H, Kim H, Kang K Bone Joint Res. 2020; 9(7):421-428.

PMID: 32864113 PMC: 7437519. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.97.BJR-2019-0384.R1.


Biomechanical and Clinical Effect of Patient-Specific or Customized Knee Implants: A Review.

Lee J, Koh Y, Kang K J Clin Med. 2020; 9(5).

PMID: 32455733 PMC: 7290390. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051559.


Finite Element Study on the Preservation of Normal Knee Kinematics with Respect to the Prosthetic Design in Patient-Specific Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Koh Y, Park K, Kang K Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:1829385.

PMID: 32258105 PMC: 7109557. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1829385.


Prediction of wear performance in femoral and tibial conformity in patient-specific cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Koh Y, Park K, Lee H, Park J, Kang K J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1):24.

PMID: 31969195 PMC: 6977248. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-1548-4.


References
1.
Riddle D, Jiranek W, McGlynn F . Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(3):408-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.012. View

2.
Berend K, Lombardi Jr A, Adams J . Obesity, young age, patellofemoral disease, and anterior knee pain: identifying the unicondylar arthroplasty patient in the United States. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(5 Suppl):19-23. View

3.
Morra E, Greenwald A . Polymer insert stress in total knee designs during high-flexion activities: a finite element study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87 Suppl 2:120-4. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00436. View

4.
Emerson Jr R, Hansborough T, Reitman R, Rosenfeldt W, Higgins L . Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404):62-70. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00011. View

5.
Ansari S, Warwick D, Ackroyd C, Newman J . Incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism after 1,390 knee arthroplasties without routine prophylactic anticoagulation, except in high-risk cases. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(6):599-602. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90131-5. View