» Articles » PMID: 20456751

Extended Prophylaxis with Bemiparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery for Cancer: the CANBESURE Randomized Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Hematology
Date 2010 May 12
PMID 20456751
Citations 72
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is not enough clinical evidence to make a strong recommendation on the optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis using low-molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in patients undergoing major cancer surgery.

Patients And Methods: CANBESURE is a randomized, double-blind study which enrolled patients admitted for abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer. They received 3500 IU of bemiparin subcutaneously once daily for 8 days and were then randomized to receive either bemiparin or placebo for 20 additional days. Bilateral venography was performed after 20 days and evaluated blinded. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and all-cause mortality at the end of double-blind period. Major venous thromboembolism (proximal deep-vein thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism and venous thromboembolism-related deaths) was also evaluated. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding.

Results: Six hundred and twenty-five and 488 patients were included in the safety and main efficacy analyzes, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 25 out of 248 patients (10.1%) in the bemiparin group and 32 out of 240 (13.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk reduction 24.4%; 95% CI: -23.7-53.8%; P = 0.26). At the end of double-blind period, major venous thromboembolism occurred in 2 (0.8%) and 11 (4.6%) patients, respectively (relative risk reduction 82.4%; 95% CI: 21.5-96.1%; P = 0.010). No significant difference was found in major bleedings.

Conclusions: Four weeks compared with 1 week of prophylaxis with bemiparin after abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery did not significantly reduce the primary efficacy outcome, but decreased major venous thromboembolism (VTE) without increasing hemorrhagic complications.

Citing Articles

Extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and clinically relevant venous thromboembolism after major abdominal and pelvic surgery: international, prospective, propensity score-weighted cohort study.

Br J Surg. 2025; 112(3).

PMID: 40067192 PMC: 11894929. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf005.


Comparison of efficacy and safety of thrombus prevention strategies after abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery: Bayesian network based meta-analysis.

Qin S, Guo S, Yao Y, He Y, Xu D, Su H Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1445485.

PMID: 40007998 PMC: 11851121. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1445485.


A Three-year Retrospective Study Looking at Preventing Hospital Acquired Thrombosis.

Kammath V, Gupta A, Bald A, Hope G, Kansal N, Al Samaraee A Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2024; 22(2):212-222.

PMID: 38288832 DOI: 10.2174/0118715257269027231228114930.


Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Associated with Increased Risk of Postoperative DVT After Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: a NSQIP Analysis.

Robbins K, Newcomer Jr K, Barnell E, Anzelmo M, Liu J, Hawkins W Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 31(5):2873-2881.

PMID: 38151621 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14763-y.


Can Risk-Based Thromboprophylaxis Practice Guidelines be Safely Used in Esophagectomy Cases? Experience of an Academic Health System.

Edwards M, Akram Hussain M, Spaulding A, Brennan E, Bowers S, Elli E J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 27(10):2045-2056.

PMID: 37670109 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05815-5.