» Articles » PMID: 20452991

Comparison of Healthcare Resource Use Between Patients Receiving Ondansetron or Palonosetron As Prophylaxis for Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Oncology
Pharmacy
Date 2010 May 11
PMID 20452991
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To analyze the differences between ondansetron and palonosetron in healthcare resource use (i.e., inpatient/ outpatient encounters) among patients receiving intraperitoneal cisplatin.

Method: A medical record review was performed. Intraperitoneal cisplatin administrations for gynecological cancers from January through June 2006 and from October 2007 through June 2008 were divided into two groups based on the serotonin-receptor antagonist used. The occurrence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)-related hospital readmissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient encounters occurring within 7 days after cisplatin administration was compared. CINV-related resource use was defined as events associated with dehydration, hypovolemia, nausea/vomiting, hypokalemia, constipation, shortness of breath, or syncope/collapse.

Results: Ondansetron or palonosetron was used in 39 and 89 cisplatin administrations, respectively. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with mean age of 59 years and ovarian cancer being the most common cancer. Length of stay was approximately 2 days. Palonosetron was always administered as a single-day therapy while one- or multi-day ondansetron therapy was administered in 27% and 73% of cycles, respectively. A trend towards more CINV-related hospitalizations with ondansetron versus palonosetron was observed (5.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.09) with no significant difference in other CINV-related encounters.

Conclusion: Palonosetron was associated with a trend to a lower risk of CINV-related hospital readmission than ondansetron in patients receiving intraperitoneal cisplatin for gynecological cancers, although not statistically significant. The duration of ondansetron therapy might be suboptimal with 27% of patients receiving only 1 day of therapy during hospital stay. These findings need to be confirmed in future studies.

Citing Articles

Main reasons and predictive factors of cancer-related emergency department visits in a Hungarian tertiary care center.

Koch M, Varga C, Soos V, Prenek L, Porcsa L, Szakall A BMC Emerg Med. 2022; 22(1):114.

PMID: 35739467 PMC: 9219147. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00670-0.


A Smartphone-Based Decision Support Tool for Predicting Patients at Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Retrospective Study on App Development Using Decision Tree Induction.

Mosa A, Rana M, Islam H, Hossain A, Yoo I JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021; 9(12):e27024.

PMID: 34860677 PMC: 8686466. DOI: 10.2196/27024.


Metagenomics and chemotherapy-induced nausea: A roadmap for future research.

Crowder S, Hoogland A, Welniak T, LaFranchise E, Carpenter K, Li D Cancer. 2021; 128(3):461-470.

PMID: 34643945 PMC: 8776572. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33892.


A Systematic Review of Emergency Department Use Among Cancer Patients.

Lash R, Bell J, Reed S, Poghosyan H, Rodgers J, Kim K Cancer Nurs. 2016; 40(2):135-144.

PMID: 26925998 PMC: 5001935. DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000360.


Resource Utilization for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Events in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Antiemetic Regimens.

Schwartzberg L, Harrow B, Lal L, Radtchenko J, Lyman G Am Health Drug Benefits. 2015; 8(5):273-82.

PMID: 26380034 PMC: 4567059.