» Articles » PMID: 20451231

Redo Surgery for Failed Colorectal or Coloanal Anastomosis: a Valuable Surgical Challenge

Overview
Journal Surgery
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2010 May 11
PMID 20451231
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Redo surgery (RS) in patients with failed anastomosis is a rare procedure, and data about this surgery are lacking. The aim of this study was to examine the operative results and long-term outcomes of RS.

Methods: All patients who underwent RS between 1999 and 2008 were included. Data were analyzed from a prospective colorectal database. Failure of the procedure was defined as the inability to perform the RS or the inability to close the defunctioning stoma.

Results: Thirty-three patients (22 men) underwent the first surgery at a mean age of 53.4 years. Twenty-four had a colorectal anastomosis (CRA) and nine a coloanal anastomosis (CAA). The reasons for performing RS were stricture (n = 17), prior Hartmann procedure for complication on initial anastomosis (n = 6), chronic fistula (n = 5) or miscellaneous (n = 5). RS was impossible for 2 patients due to extensive adhesions. The mean operating time was 279 min (133-480) and the overall postoperative morbidity rate was 55%. The rate of anastomotic leakage and/or isolated pelvic abscess was 27%. After a mean delay of 3.9 months (0.3-16), 26 patients (79%) had a stoma closure. The mean number of stools per day was 3.2. The failure rates after new handsewn CAA and new stapled CRA were 33% (4/12) and 5% (1/19), respectively (P = .0385). The type of the former anastomosis influenced the success rate of restoring the intestinal continuity: failure rate after prior CAA was 56% and 8% after prior CRA (P = .0031).

Conclusion: Redo surgery for failure of previous CRA or CAA is feasible but requires a demanding surgical procedure with high short-term morbidity.

Citing Articles

Recanalization of anastomotic occlusion following rectal cancer surgery using a rendezvous endoscopic technique with transillumination: A case report.

Chi J, Luo G, Shan H, Lin J, Wu X, Li J World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(37):4149-4155.

PMID: 39474396 PMC: 11514532. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i37.4149.


Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study.

Kim Y, Hong S, Lim S, Yang D, Kim E, Kim M Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(4):1775-1783.

PMID: 38278933 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10661-2.


Gel immersion echoendoscope-guided puncture before radial incision and cutting for complete rectal anastomotic obstruction.

Osera S, Hisa T, Akiyama G, Kudo A, Yamada T, Fukushima H Endoscopy. 2023; 55(S 01):E852-E853.

PMID: 37369248 PMC: 10299863. DOI: 10.1055/a-2106-1744.


Redo laparoscopic colorectal resection: a retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.

Sakai J, Watanabe J, Ohya H, Takei S, Toritani K, Suwa Y Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023; 38(1):145.

PMID: 37243791 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04439-0.


Gaining Mesenteric Length following Colorectal Resection: Essential Maneuvers to Avoid Anastomotic Tension.

Vargas H Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023; 36(1):37-46.

PMID: 36643828 PMC: 9839430. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758776.