» Articles » PMID: 20443953

Principles of Human Subjects Protections Applied in an Opt-out, De-identified Biobank

Overview
Journal Clin Transl Sci
Date 2010 May 7
PMID 20443953
Citations 144
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

BioVU, the Vanderbilt DNA Databank, is one of few biobanks that qualifies as non-human subjects research as determined by the local IRB and the federal Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP). BioVU accrues DNA samples extracted from leftover blood remaining from routine clinical testing. The resource is linked to a de-identified version of data extracted from an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system, termed the Synthetic Device (SD), in which all personal identifiers have been removed. Thus, there is no identifiable private information attached to the records. The Belmont Report enumerates the importance of the boundary between practice and research, and three principles: Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice, which constitute the essential ethical framework by which IRBs and ethics committees judge the risks and benefits of research involving human subjects. BioVU was developed by designing and implementing new procedures, for which there were no previously established methods, which are consistent with the principles of the Belmont Report. These included special oversight and governance, new informatics technologies, provisions to accommodate patients' preferences, as well as an extensive public education and communications component. Considerations of core principles and protections in the practical implementation of BioVU is the focus of this paper.

Citing Articles

Twenty-Five Years of Evolution and Hurdles in Electronic Health Records and Interoperability in Medical Research: Comprehensive Review.

Shen Y, Yu J, Zhou J, Hu G J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e59024.

PMID: 39787599 PMC: 11757985. DOI: 10.2196/59024.


Social Determinants of Health and Lifestyle Risk Factors Modulate Genetic Susceptibility for Women's Health Outcomes.

Guare L, Das J, Caruth L, Setia-Verma S Pac Symp Biocomput. 2024; 30:296-313.

PMID: 39670378 PMC: 11658798.


Uterine fibroids show evidence of shared genetic architecture with blood pressure traits.

Akerele A, Piekos J, Kim J, Khankari N, Hellwege J, Edwards T Pac Symp Biocomput. 2024; 30:281-295.

PMID: 39670377 PMC: 11649017.


Biobanking with genetics shapes precision medicine and global health.

Gallagher C, Ginsburg G, Musick A Nat Rev Genet. 2024; 26(3):191-202.

PMID: 39567741 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-024-00794-y.


A Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Study of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure, Lipid Profile, and Heart Failure Subtypes.

Liu C, Hui Q, Wells Q, Farber-Eger E, Gaziano J, Wilson P Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39336717 PMC: 11431108. DOI: 10.3390/genes15091126.


References
1.
Chen D, Rosenstein D, Muthappan P, Hilsenbeck S, Miller F, Emanuel E . Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165(6):652-5. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.6.652. View

2.
Pulley J, Brace M, Bernard G, Masys D . Evaluation of the effectiveness of posters to provide information to patients about a DNA database and their opportunity to opt out. Cell Tissue Bank. 2007; 8(3):233-41. DOI: 10.1007/s10561-007-9033-4. View

3.
Junghans C, Feder G, Hemingway H, Timmis A, Jones M . Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies. BMJ. 2005; 331(7522):940. PMC: 1261191. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38583.625613.AE. View

4.
Wendler D, Emanuel E . The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think?. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162(13):1457-62. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.162.13.1457. View

5.
Pulley J, Brace M, Bernard G, Masys D . Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank. Cell Tissue Bank. 2007; 9(1):55-65. DOI: 10.1007/s10561-007-9051-2. View