Identification of Multiple Call Categories Within the Rich Repertoire of Adult Rat 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations: Effects of Amphetamine and Social Context

Overview

Journal Psychopharmacology (Berl)

Specialty Pharmacology

Date 2010 May 6

PMID 20443111

Citations 143

Authors

Jennifer M Wright

Jim C Gourdon

Paul B S Clarke

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Rationale: 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) emitted by adult rats are heterogeneous; they occur over a wide frequency range, show varying degrees of frequency modulation, and appear to differ in their behavioral significance. However, they have not been extensively categorized.

Objectives: The main objective of this study was to identify subtypes of 50-kHz USVs emitted by adult rats and to determine how amphetamine (AMPH) or social testing condition affects their relative and absolute production rate and acoustic characteristics. A second objective was to determine the extent of individual differences in call rate, call subtype profile, and acoustic parameters (i.e., duration, bandwidth, and mean peak frequency).

Methods: Adult male Long-Evans rats were administered systemic amphetamine (0.25-2 mg/kg, IP) and tested individually or with a cage mate for 20 min. Call categories were defined based on visual inspection of over 20,000 USV spectrograms. Surgical devocalization was performed on a subset of AMPH-tested rats in order to confirm the authenticity of call subtypes.

Results: Fourteen categories of 50-kHz USVs were recognized. Call subtypes were differentially affected by social context, AMPH dose, and time within session. In contrast, the acoustic characteristics of call subtypes were notably stable. Marked and stable inter-individual differences occurred with respect to overall 50-kHz call rate, acoustic parameters, and call profile.

Conclusions: The present findings, obtained under saline and amphetamine test conditions, provide the first detailed classification of adult rat 50-kHz USVs. Consideration of 50-kHz USV subtypes may advance our understanding of inter-rat communication and affective state.

Citing Articles

What do ultrasound vocalizations really mean in rats with different origins of pain?.

Yu Y, Li C, Du R, Wang X, Chen J Pain Rep. 2024; 10(1):e1230.

PMID: 39726851 PMC: 11671076. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001230.

Shaping behaviors through social experience and their proposed sensitivity to stress.

Rosenkranz J Learn Mem. 2024; 31(12).

PMID: 39681461 PMC: 11662146. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053926.124.

Maternal exposure to buprenorphine, but not methadone, during pregnancy reduces social play behavior across two generations of offspring.

Nyberg H, Bogen I, Nygaard E, Achterberg M, Andersen J Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 242(3):663-680.

PMID: 39633163 PMC: 11861248. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06718-2.

Stress-Induced Ultrasonic Vocalization in Laboratory Rats and Mice: A Scoping Review.

Venkatraman A, Bretl M, Kim S, Christensen L, Kelm-Nelson C, Ciucci M Brain Sci. 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 39595872 PMC: 11591760. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14111109.

Deep learning algorithms reveal increased social activity in rats at the onset of the dark phase of the light/dark cycle.

Popik P, Cyrano E, Golebiowska J, Malikowska-Racia N, Potasiewicz A, Nikiforuk A PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0307794.

PMID: 39514582 PMC: 11548743. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307794.

References

Blumberg M . Rodent ultrasonic short calls: locomotion, biomechanics, and communication. J Comp Psychol. 1992; 106(4):360-5. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.106.4.360. View

Mallo T, Matrov D, Herm L, Koiv K, Eller M, Rinken A . Tickling-induced 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalization is individually stable and predicts behaviour in tests of anxiety and depression in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2007; 184(1):57-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.06.015. View

Knutson B, Burgdorf J, Panksepp J . Ultrasonic vocalizations as indices of affective states in rats. Psychol Bull. 2002; 128(6):961-77. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.961. View

White N, Cagiano R, Moises A, Barfield R . Changes in mating vocalizations over the ejaculatory series in rats (Rattus norvegicus). J Comp Psychol. 1990; 104(3):255-62. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.3.255. View

Brudzynski S, Chiu E . Behavioural responses of laboratory rats to playback of 22 kHz ultrasonic calls. Physiol Behav. 1995; 57(6):1039-44. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)00003-2. View

Holy T, Guo Z . Ultrasonic songs of male mice. PLoS Biol. 2005; 3(12):e386. PMC: 1275525. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030386. View

Blanchard R, Blanchard D, Agullana R, Weiss S . Twenty-two kHz alarm cries to presentation of a predator, by laboratory rats living in visible burrow systems. Physiol Behav. 1991; 50(5):967-72. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90423-l. View

Calvino B, Besson J, Boehrer A, Depaulis A . Ultrasonic vocalization (22-28 kHz) in a model of chronic pain, the arthritic rat: effects of analgesic drugs. Neuroreport. 1996; 7(2):581-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199601310-00049. View

Han J, Bird G, Li W, Jones J, Neugebauer V . Computerized analysis of audible and ultrasonic vocalizations of rats as a standardized measure of pain-related behavior. J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 141(2):261-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.07.005. View

10.

Kaltwasser M . Acoustic startle induced ultrasonic vocalization in the rat: a novel animal model of anxiety?. Behav Brain Res. 1991; 43(2):133-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80063-4. View

11.

Burgdorf J, Kroes R, Moskal J, Pfaus J, Brudzynski S, Panksepp J . Ultrasonic vocalizations of rats (Rattus norvegicus) during mating, play, and aggression: Behavioral concomitants, relationship to reward, and self-administration of playback. J Comp Psychol. 2008; 122(4):357-67. DOI: 10.1037/a0012889. View

12.

Ciucci M, Ma S, Fox C, Kane J, Ramig L, Schallert T . Qualitative changes in ultrasonic vocalization in rats after unilateral dopamine depletion or haloperidol: a preliminary study. Behav Brain Res. 2007; 182(2):284-9. PMC: 1993917. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.02.020. View

13.

Burgdorf J, Knutson B, Panksepp J, Shippenberg T . Evaluation of rat ultrasonic vocalizations as predictors of the conditioned aversive effects of drugs. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001; 155(1):35-42. DOI: 10.1007/s002130100685. View

14.

Fendt M, Schwienbacher I, Schnitzler H . Carbachol injections into the nucleus accumbens induce 50 kHz calls in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2006; 401(1-2):10-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.02.069. View

15.

Schwarting R, Jegan N, Wohr M . Situational factors, conditions and individual variables which can determine ultrasonic vocalizations in male adult Wistar rats. Behav Brain Res. 2007; 182(2):208-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.01.029. View

16.

Burgdorf J, Panksepp J . The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005; 30(2):173-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.001. View

17.

Grilly D, Loveland A . What is a "low dose" of d-amphetamine for inducing behavioral effects in laboratory rats?. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001; 153(2):155-69. DOI: 10.1007/s002130000580. View

18.

Ciucci M, Ahrens A, Ma S, Kane J, Windham E, Woodlee M . Reduction of dopamine synaptic activity: degradation of 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalization in rats. Behav Neurosci. 2009; 123(2):328-36. PMC: 2737695. DOI: 10.1037/a0014593. View

19.

Brudzynski S . Communication of adult rats by ultrasonic vocalization: biological, sociobiological, and neuroscience approaches. ILAR J. 2008; 50(1):43-50. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.50.1.43. View

20.

Wohr M, Schwarting R . Ultrasonic communication in rats: effects of morphine and naloxone on vocal and behavioral responses to playback of 50-kHz vocalizations. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009; 94(2):285-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2009.09.008. View