A Novel Lifting System for Minimally Accessed Surgery: a Prospective Comparison Between "Laparo-V" Gasless and CO2 Pneumoperitoneum Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Overview
General Surgery
Affiliations
Purpose: Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) pneumoperitoneum can lead to cardiopulmonary loading and complications. By comparing with conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum approach, we introduce a novel Laparo-V lifting system for gasless laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Methods: In a prospective study, patients with colonic lesions underwent either Laparo-V gasless (n = 20) or conventional CO(2) pneumoperitoneum (n = 19) laparoscopic colectomy. Twenty patients who underwent open surgery were enrolled as control. Intra-operative monitoring includes blood pressures, heart rate, O(2) saturation, and end-tidal CO(2) (ET-CO(2)). Serum level of interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), cortisol, and lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4/CD8) were measured repeatedly. Postoperative recovery was indicated by return of bowel function and postoperative hospital stay.
Results: Patient characteristics were not different between the three groups. There were three conversions in each laparoscopy group, making conversion rates 15% and 15.7% for Laparo-V and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum groups, respectively. Vital signs remained stable in Laparo-V and open surgery groups; while, elevated ET-CO(2) and heart rate were noted in CO(2) pneumoperitoneum group. Both laparoscopy groups had a significant faster recovery and shorter hospital stay than the open surgery group. Postoperative elevation of IL-6, CRP, and cortisol level was observed in all the three groups, of note, the change was most significant in the open surgery group.
Conclusions: Laparo-V gasless laparoscopic approach is feasible in various colorectal procedures. It carries advantages comparable with those of CO(2) pneumoperitoneum; while, the intra-operative hemodynamic was more stable. Therefore, laparoscopic approach using the Laparo-V system could be beneficial to patients with high cardiopulmonary risk and represents an alternative for minimally invasive surgery.
Global scientific production on gasless laparoscopy: a bibliometric analysis.
Perez-Reategui J, Arge-Gamarra B, Diaz-Ruiz R, Hernandez-Vasquez A Front Surg. 2024; 11:1416681.
PMID: 39183778 PMC: 11341392. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1416681.
Aruparayil N, Bolton W, Mishra A, Bains L, Gnanaraj J, KING R Surg Endosc. 2021; 35(12):6427-6437.
PMID: 34398284 PMC: 8599349. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08677-7.
Safety and efficiency of gasless laparoscopy: a systematic review protocol.
Shoman H, Sandler S, Peters A, Farooq A, Gruendl M, Trinh S Syst Rev. 2020; 9(1):98.
PMID: 32354349 PMC: 7193343. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01365-y.
Gasless Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with New Abdominal-Wall Retraction System.
Kim M, Hwang J, Kim J, Kim S, Lee S, Kim B JSLS. 2020; 24(1).
PMID: 32161436 PMC: 7056266. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00061.
Gasless single-incision laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: initial experience.
Ng M, Ng K Hernia. 2017; 21(5):803-808.
PMID: 28808824 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-017-1637-4.