» Articles » PMID: 20407059

Spoken Language Development in Children Following Cochlear Implantation

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 Apr 22
PMID 20407059
Citations 348
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Cochlear implantation is a surgical alternative to traditional amplification (hearing aids) that can facilitate spoken language development in young children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

Objective: To prospectively assess spoken language acquisition following cochlear implantation in young children.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Prospective, longitudinal, and multidimensional assessment of spoken language development over a 3-year period in children who underwent cochlear implantation before 5 years of age (n = 188) from 6 US centers and hearing children of similar ages (n = 97) from 2 preschools recruited between November 2002 and December 2004. Follow-up completed between November 2005 and May 2008.

Main Outcome Measures: Performance on measures of spoken language comprehension and expression (Reynell Developmental Language Scales).

Results: Children undergoing cochlear implantation showed greater improvement in spoken language performance (10.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-11.2 points per year in comprehension; 8.4; 95% CI, 7.8-9.0 in expression) than would be predicted by their preimplantation baseline scores (5.4; 95% CI, 4.1-6.7, comprehension; 5.8; 95% CI, 4.6-7.0, expression), although mean scores were not restored to age-appropriate levels after 3 years. Younger age at cochlear implantation was associated with significantly steeper rate increases in comprehension (1.1; 95% CI, 0.5-1.7 points per year younger) and expression (1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5 points per year younger). Similarly, each 1-year shorter history of hearing deficit was associated with steeper rate increases in comprehension (0.8; 95% CI, 0.2-1.2 points per year shorter) and expression (0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.0 points per year shorter). In multivariable analyses, greater residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation, higher ratings of parent-child interactions, and higher socioeconomic status were associated with greater rates of improvement in comprehension and expression.

Conclusion: The use of cochlear implants in young children was associated with better spoken language learning than would be predicted from their preimplantation scores.

Citing Articles

The neural characteristics influencing literacy outcome in children with cochlear implants.

Koirala N, Manning J, Neumann S, Anderson C, Deroche M, Wolfe J Brain Commun. 2025; 7(2):fcaf086.

PMID: 40046341 PMC: 11881800. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf086.


Resilience and vulnerability of neural speech tracking after hearing restoration.

Federici A, Fantoni M, Pavani F, Handjaras G, Bednaya E, Martinelli A Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):343.

PMID: 40025189 PMC: 11873316. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07788-4.


Teenagers and Young Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Study Approach and Baseline Characteristics.

Lofkvist U, Dahlby-Skoog M, Persson A, Asp F, Verrecchia L, Gripenberg S Audiol Res. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39997160 PMC: 11851589. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15010016.


Evaluation of pediatric cochlear implantation results.

Koubaa J, Bouatay R, Yahyaoui M, Bouaziz N, Ferjaoui M, El Korbi A Tunis Med. 2025; 102(12):1035-1040.

PMID: 39748690 PMC: 11770799. DOI: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i12.4977.


A prospective cohort study of cochlear implantation as a treatment for tinnitus in post-lingually deafened individuals.

Wang Q, Kapolowicz M, Li J, Ji F, Shen W, Wang F Commun Med (Lond). 2024; 4(1):274.

PMID: 39702461 PMC: 11659473. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00692-8.


References
1.
Svirsky M, Sloan R, Caldwell M, Miyamoto R . Speech intelligibility of prelingually deaf children with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2001; 185:123-5. DOI: 10.1177/0003489400109s1254. View

2.
Wang N, Eisenberg L, Johnson K, Fink N, Tobey E, Quittner A . Tracking development of speech recognition: longitudinal data from hierarchical assessments in the Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation Study. Otol Neurotol. 2008; 29(2):240-5. PMC: 2733235. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181627a37. View

3.
Svirsky M, Robbins A, Kirk K, Pisoni D, Miyamoto R . Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci. 2001; 11(2):153-8. PMC: 3429133. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00231. View

4.
Geers A, Tobey E, Moog J, Brenner C . Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in the preschool years: from elementary grades to high school. Int J Audiol. 2008; 47 Suppl 2:S21-30. DOI: 10.1080/14992020802339167. View

5.
Quittner A, Leibach P, Marciel K . The impact of cochlear implants on young deaf children: new methods to assess cognitive and behavioral development. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130(5):547-54. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.130.5.547. View