» Articles » PMID: 20406484

Effect of Probe Characteristics on the Subtractive Hybridization Efficiency of Human Genomic DNA

Overview
Journal BMC Res Notes
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2010 Apr 22
PMID 20406484
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The detection sensitivity of low abundance pathogenic species by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be significantly enhanced by removing host nucleic acids. This selective removal can be performed using a magnetic bead-based solid phase with covalently immobilized capture probes. One of the requirements to attain efficient host background nucleic acids subtraction is the capture probe characteristics.

Findings: In this study we investigate how various capture probe characteristics influence the subtraction efficiency. While the primary focus of this report is the impact of probe length, we also studied the impact of probe conformation as well as the amount of capture probe attached to the solid phase. The probes were immobilized on magnetic microbeads functionalized with a phosphorous dendrimer. The subtraction efficiency was assessed by quantitative real time PCR using a single-step capture protocol and genomic DNA as target. Our results indicate that short probes (100 to 200 bp) exhibit the best subtraction efficiency. Additionally, higher subtraction efficiencies with these probes were obtained as the amount of probe immobilized on the solid phase decreased. Under optimal probes condition, our protocol showed a 90 - 95% subtraction efficiency of human genomic DNA.

Conclusions: The characteristics of the capture probe are important for the design of efficient solid phases. The length, conformation and abundance of the probes determine the capture efficiency of the solid phase.

Citing Articles

Effects of miR-145-5p through NRAS on the cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion in melanoma by inhibiting MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways.

Liu S, Gao G, Yan D, Chen X, Yao X, Guo S Cancer Med. 2017; 6(4):819-833.

PMID: 28332309 PMC: 5387172. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1030.


Targeted amplification for enhanced detection of biothreat agents by next-generation sequencing.

Gardner S, Frey K, Redden C, Thissen J, Allen J, Allred A BMC Res Notes. 2015; 8:682.

PMID: 26572552 PMC: 4647626. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1530-0.


Development of a single-step subtraction method for eukaryotic 18S and 28S ribonucleic acids.

Archer M, Lin B J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011; 2011:910369.

PMID: 21765639 PMC: 3134377. DOI: 10.1155/2011/910369.

References
1.
Yeung S, Hsing I . Manipulation and extraction of genomic DNA from cell lysate by functionalized magnetic particles for lab on a chip applications. Biosens Bioelectron. 2005; 21(7):989-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2005.03.008. View

2.
Gao Y, Wolf L, Georgiadis R . Secondary structure effects on DNA hybridization kinetics: a solution versus surface comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(11):3370-7. PMC: 1488884. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl422. View

3.
Mangiapan G, Vokurka M, Schouls L, Cadranel J, Lecossier D, van Embden J . Sequence capture-PCR improves detection of mycobacterial DNA in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1996; 34(5):1209-15. PMC: 228983. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.34.5.1209-1215.1996. View

4.
Okahata Y, Kawase M, Niikura K, Ohtake F, Furusawa H, Ebara Y . Kinetic measurements of DNA hybridization on an oligonucleotide-immobilized 27-MHz quartz crystal microbalance. Anal Chem. 2005; 70(7):1288-96. DOI: 10.1021/ac970584w. View

5.
Hagan M, Chakraborty A . Hybridization dynamics of surface immobilized DNA. J Chem Phys. 2004; 120(10):4958-68. DOI: 10.1063/1.1645786. View