» Articles » PMID: 20403481

Relation of Different Measures of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol to Risk of Coronary Artery Disease and Death in a Meta-regression Analysis of Large-scale Trials of Statin Therapy

Overview
Journal Am J Cardiol
Date 2010 Apr 21
PMID 20403481
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have established the efficacy of statins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. The benefits observed are often framed in terms of percentage reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline or percentage reductions between control and treatment groups, although epidemiologic data suggest that the absolute intergroup difference in LDL cholesterol (DeltaLDL(Control-Rx)) is the more informative measure. A systematic review of large-scale trials of statins versus placebo, usual care, or active (lower dose statin) control was conducted to calculate updated summary estimates of risk reduction in coronary artery disease and all-cause mortality. Meta-regression analysis was used to ascertain the relations of different LDL cholesterol metrics to outcomes. In 20 eligible RCTs, there were significant overall reductions for coronary artery disease (odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.78) and mortality (odds ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 0.94), but with substantial variability in trial results. DeltaLDL(Control-Rx) was the strongest determinant of coronary artery disease risk reduction, particularly after excluding active-comparator studies, and was independent of baseline LDL cholesterol. In contrast, baseline LDL cholesterol edged out DeltaLDL(Control-Rx) as the strongest determinant of mortality, but neither was significant after the exclusion of active-comparator studies. The exclusion of 3 RCTs involving distinct populations, however, rendered DeltaLDL(Control-Rx) the predominant determinant of mortality reduction. In conclusion, these findings underscore the primacy of absolute reductions in LDL cholesterol in the design and interpretation of RCTs of lipid-lowering therapies and in framing treatment recommendations on the basis of the proved coronary benefits of these drugs.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Dietary Diversity, Lifestyle, and Blood Lipids on Carotid Atherosclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Wang Y, Li L, Li Y, Liu M, Gan G, Zhou Y Nutrients. 2022; 14(4).

PMID: 35215465 PMC: 8876384. DOI: 10.3390/nu14040815.


Reporting bias in the literature on the associations of health-related behaviors and statins with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.

Rezende L, Rey-Lopez J, Herick de Sa T, Chartres N, Fabbri A, Powell L PLoS Biol. 2018; 16(6):e2005761.

PMID: 29912869 PMC: 6023226. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005761.


Impact of combined lipid lowering and blood pressure control on coronary plaque: myocardial ischemia treated by percutaneous coronary intervention and plaque regression by lipid lowering and blood pressure controlling assessed by intravascular....

Kawashiri M, Sakata K, Hayashi K, Gamou T, Kanaya H, Miwa K Heart Vessels. 2016; 32(5):539-548.

PMID: 27798731 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-016-0910-2.


Comparison of the Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding among Different Statin Exposures with Concomitant Administration of Warfarin: Electronic Health Record-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Shin D, Yoon D, Lim S, Hong J, Park R, Lee J PLoS One. 2016; 11(7):e0158130.

PMID: 27386858 PMC: 4936673. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158130.


Dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease in women.

Cifkova R, Krajcoviechova A Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015; 17(7):609.

PMID: 26026998 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-015-0609-5.


References
1.
Gould A, Rossouw J, Santanello N, Heyse J, Furberg C . Cholesterol reduction yields clinical benefit: impact of statin trials. Circulation. 1998; 97(10):946-52. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.97.10.946. View

2.
Grundy S, Cleeman J, Merz C, Brewer Jr H, Clark L, Hunninghake D . Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004; 110(2):227-39. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133317.49796.0E. View

3.
. Results of the low-dose (20 mg) pravastatin GISSI Prevenzione trial in 4271 patients with recent myocardial infarction: do stopped trials contribute to overall knowledge? GISSI Prevenzione Investigators (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della.... Ital Heart J. 2001; 1(12):810-20. View

4.
Pedersen T, Faergeman O, Kastelein J, Olsson A, Tikkanen M, Holme I . High-dose atorvastatin vs usual-dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: the IDEAL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005; 294(19):2437-45. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.19.2437. View

5.
Law M, Wald N . Risk factor thresholds: their existence under scrutiny. BMJ. 2002; 324(7353):1570-6. PMC: 1123506. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1570. View