Electronic Medical Records, Nurse Staffing, and Nurse-sensitive Patient Outcomes: Evidence from California Hospitals, 1998-2007

Overview

Journal Health Serv Res

Specialty Health Services

Date 2010 Apr 21

PMID 20403065

Citations 24

Authors

Michael F Furukawa

T S Raghu

Benjamin B M Shao

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the effects of electronic medical records (EMR) implementation on medical-surgical acute unit costs, length of stay, nurse staffing levels, nursing skill mix, nurse cost per hour, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes.

Data Sources: Data on EMR implementation came from the 1998-2007 HIMSS Analytics Databases. Data on nurse staffing and patient outcomes came from the 1998-2007 Annual Financial Disclosure Reports and Patient Discharge Databases of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD).

Methods: Longitudinal analysis of an unbalanced panel of 326 short-term, general acute care hospitals in California. Marginal effects estimated using fixed effects (within-hospital) OLS regression.

Principal Findings: EMR implementation was associated with 6-10 percent higher cost per discharge in medical-surgical acute units. EMR stage 2 increased registered nurse hours per patient day by 15-26 percent and reduced licensed vocational nurse cost per hour by 2-4 percent. EMR stage 3 was associated with 3-4 percent lower rates of in-hospital mortality for conditions.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that advanced EMR applications may increase hospital costs and nurse staffing levels, as well as increase complications and decrease mortality for some conditions. Contrary to expectation, we found no support for the proposition that EMR reduced length of stay or decreased the demand for nurses.

Citing Articles

Effect of electronic records on mortality among patients in hospital and primary healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Bogale T, Derseh L, Abraham L, Willems H, Metzger J, Abere B Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1377826.

PMID: 38988733 PMC: 11233798. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1377826.

Understanding the impacts of health information systems on patient flow management: A systematic review across several decades of research.

Nguyen Q, Wybrow M, Burstein F, Taylor D, Enticott J PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0274493.

PMID: 36094946 PMC: 9467348. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274493.

Higher Electronic Health Record Functionality Is Associated with Lower Operating Costs in Urban-but Not Rural-Hospitals.

Rhoades C, Whitacre B, Davis A Appl Clin Inform. 2022; 13(3):665-676.

PMID: 35926839 PMC: 9329141. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750415.

Value of the Electronic Medical Record for Hospital Care: Update From the Literature.

Uslu A, Stausberg J J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(12):e26323.

PMID: 34941544 PMC: 8738989. DOI: 10.2196/26323.

Nurse Motivation, Engagement and Well-Being before an Electronic Medical Record System Implementation: A Mixed Methods Study.

Jedwab R, Hutchinson A, Manias E, Calvo R, Dobroff N, Glozier N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5).

PMID: 33800307 PMC: 7967448. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052726.

References

Hakes B, Whittington J . Assessing the impact of an electronic medical record on nurse documentation time. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008; 26(4):234-41. DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304801.00628.ab. View

Eslami S, de Keizer N, Abu-Hanna A . The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients--a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2007; 77(6):365-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.001. View

Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles J, Karsh B . Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15(4):408-23. PMC: 2442264. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2616. View

Aiken L . Economics of nursing. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2008; 9(2):73-9. PMC: 2577000. DOI: 10.1177/1527154408318253. View

Buchan J, Aiken L . Solving nursing shortages: a common priority. J Clin Nurs. 2009; 17(24):3262-8. PMC: 2858425. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02636.x. View

Thouin M, Hoffman J, Ford E . The effect of information technology investment on firm-level performance in the health care industry. Health Care Manage Rev. 2007; 33(1):60-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000304491.03147.06. View

Kossman S, Scheidenhelm S . Nurses' perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008; 26(2):69-77. DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304775.40531.67. View

Amarasingham R, Plantinga L, Diener-West M, Gaskin D, Powe N . Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(2):108-14. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.520. View

DesRoches C, Donelan K, Buerhaus P, Zhonghe L . Registered nurses' use of electronic health records: findings from a national survey. Medscape J Med. 2008; 10(7):164. PMC: 2525465. View

10.

Ash J, Sittig D, Poon E, Guappone K, Campbell E, Dykstra R . The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14(4):415-23. PMC: 2244906. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2373. View

11.

Tiedeman M, Lookinland S . Traditional models of care delivery: what have we learned?. J Nurs Adm. 2004; 34(6):291-7. DOI: 10.1097/00005110-200406000-00008. View

12.

Tucker A, Spear S . Operational failures and interruptions in hospital nursing. Health Serv Res. 2006; 41(3 Pt 1):643-62. PMC: 1713207. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00502.x. View

13.

Burnes Bolton L, Aydin C, Donaldson N, Brown D, Sandhu M, Fridman M . Mandated nurse staffing ratios in California: a comparison of staffing and nursing-sensitive outcomes pre- and postregulation. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2008; 8(4):238-50. DOI: 10.1177/1527154407312737. View

14.

Campbell E, Sittig D, Ash J, Guappone K, Dykstra R . Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13(5):547-56. PMC: 1561794. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2042. View

15.

Kennedy R . The nursing shortage and the role of technology. Nurs Outlook. 2003; 51(3):S33-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0029-6554(03)00093-9. View

16.

Burnes Bolton L, Gassert C, Cipriano P . Technology solutions can make nursing care safer and more efficient. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2009; 22(4):24-30. View

17.

Garrido T, Raymond B, Jamieson L, Liang L, Wiesenthal A . Making the business case for hospital information systems--a Kaiser Permanente investment decision. J Health Care Finance. 2005; 31(2):16-25. View

18.

Thompson D, Classen D, Haug P . EMRs in the fourth stage: the future of electronic medical records based on the experience at Intermountain Health Care. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2009; 21(3):49-60. View

19.

Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y . The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12(5):505-16. PMC: 1205599. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1700. View

20.

Menachemi N, Burkhardt J, Shewchuk R, Burke D, Brooks R . Hospital information technology and positive financial performance: a different approach to finding an ROI. J Healthc Manag. 2006; 51(1):40-58. View