» Articles » PMID: 20396885

Valuing New Jersey's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital: a Spatially Explicit Benefit Transfer Approach

Overview
Journal Environ Manage
Date 2010 Apr 17
PMID 20396885
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We intend to estimate the value of ecosystem services in the U.S. State of New Jersey using spatially explicit benefit transfer. The aggregated net rent, a conservative underestimate for the total economic value of the state's natural environment, ranged from $11.6 to $19.6 billion/year, conditional on how inclusive we were in selecting the primary studies used to calculate the central tendency values to transfer. In addition to calculating the range, mean, and standard deviation for each of 12 ecosystem services for 11 Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) types, we also conduct a gap analysis of how well ecosystem service values are represented in the literature. We then map these values by assuming a mean value for each LULC and apply this to spatial data. As to sensitivity analysis, we calculate the net present value of New Jersey's natural environment utilizing three different methods of discounting. These research results provide a useful, albeit imperfect, basis for assessing the value of ecosystem services and natural capital, and their comparison with the value of conventional human and built capitals.

Citing Articles

Identifying the Impact of Landscape Pattern on Ecosystem Services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China.

Liu L, Chen X, Chen W, Ye X Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(14).

PMID: 32674375 PMC: 7400253. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145063.


The Application and Usefulness of Economic Analyses for Water Quality Management in Coastal Areas.

Jewhurst S, Mulvaney K, Mazzotta M J Ocean Coast Econ. 2018; 4(1).

PMID: 29457797 PMC: 5812690. DOI: 10.15351/2373-8456.1079.


Integrating ecosystem services in terrestrial conservation planning.

Yuan M, Lo S, Yang C Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017; 24(13):12144-12154.

PMID: 28349311 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8795-x.


Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services.

Keeler B, Polasky S, Brauman K, Johnson K, Finlay J, ONeill A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(45):18619-24.

PMID: 23091018 PMC: 3494932. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1215991109.

References
1.
Farley J . The role of prices in conserving critical natural capital. Conserv Biol. 2008; 22(6):1399-408. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01090.x. View

2.
Nordhaus W . Economics. Critical assumptions in the Stern Review on climate change. Science. 2007; 317(5835):201-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.1137316. View

3.
Ehrlich P, Pringle R . Colloquium paper: where does biodiversity go from here? A grim business-as-usual forecast and a hopeful portfolio of partial solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105 Suppl 1:11579-86. PMC: 2556413. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801911105. View

4.
Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A . Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1185:54-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05167.x. View

5.
Costanza R, Perez-Maqueo O, Martinez M, Sutton P, Anderson S, Mulder K . The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. Ambio. 2008; 37(4):241-8. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[241:tvocwf]2.0.co;2. View